• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[用于监测前列腺癌患者的肿瘤标志物的临床研究;前列腺特异性抗原的评估以及与前列腺酸性磷酸酶和γ-精浆蛋白的比较]

[Clinical studies on tumor markers for monitoring prostate cancer patients; the evaluation of prostate-specific antigen and comparison with prostatic acid phosphatase and gamma-seminoprotein].

作者信息

Shinoda I

机构信息

Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Gifu University.

出版信息

Nihon Gan Chiryo Gakkai Shi. 1990 Nov 20;25(11):2627-39.

PMID:1703555
Abstract

To evaluate the usefulness of tumor markers in monitoring the patients with prostate cancer, serial measurements of serum prostate-specific antigen (PA), prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) and gamma-seminoprotein (gamma-Sm) were performed in 78 stage C or D patients. Positive rates of each marker prior to the treatment were as follows; PA; 75%, PAP; 56% and gamma-Sm; 62% in stage C, and PA; 95%, PAP; 79% and gamma-Sm; 91% in stage D. In most cases showing PR (partial response) and S (stable) in clinical responses, these three markers decreased their serum titers corresponding to clinical course if the markers were elevated at the start of the treatment. But the usefulness of PAP was lessened because of its lower positive rate than those of PA and gamma-Sm. In 33 PD (progressive disease) cases, positive rates of each marker at time of clinical diagnosis as PD were found to be 85% in PA, 55% in PAP and 76% in gamma-Sm. And with the combination assays of these three tumor markers, positive rate was elevated to 88%. Moreover, elevation of serum values of these three markers at 3 months before the progression event were observed in 50% of PA, 39% of PAP and 46% of gamma-Sm. Then the prognostic significance of each marker was examined. In PA and PAP, there were statistical differences in non-relapsing rates between patients whose reduction rates from the pretreatment value on 7th day were more than and less than 50%. But in gamma-Sm, a statistical difference between each group was firstly observed on 14th day. As a result, in monitoring patients with prostate cancer, PA and gamma-Sm are more useful than PAP and, in prediction of patients' prognosis, PA is more useful than gamma-Sm.

摘要

为评估肿瘤标志物在监测前列腺癌患者中的作用,我们对78例C期或D期患者进行了血清前列腺特异性抗原(PA)、前列腺酸性磷酸酶(PAP)和γ-精浆蛋白(γ-Sm)的系列检测。治疗前各标志物的阳性率如下:C期患者中,PA为75%,PAP为56%,γ-Sm为62%;D期患者中,PA为95%,PAP为79%,γ-Sm为91%。在大多数临床反应显示PR(部分缓解)和S(病情稳定)的病例中,如果这些标志物在治疗开始时升高,那么随着临床病程的发展,这三种标志物的血清滴度会相应降低。但由于PAP的阳性率低于PA和γ-Sm,其作用有所减弱。在33例PD(疾病进展)病例中,临床诊断为PD时各标志物的阳性率分别为:PA为85%,PAP为55%,γ-Sm为76%。而这三种肿瘤标志物联合检测时,阳性率提高到了88%。此外,在病情进展事件前3个月,观察到50%的PA、39%的PAP和46%的γ-Sm血清值升高。然后我们研究了各标志物的预后意义。在PA和PAP中,第7天较治疗前值降低率大于和小于50%的患者,其无复发率存在统计学差异。但在γ-Sm中,各分组之间的统计学差异首先在第14天观察到。结果表明,在监测前列腺癌患者时,PA和γ-Sm比PAP更有用;在预测患者预后方面,PA比γ-Sm更有用。

相似文献

1
[Clinical studies on tumor markers for monitoring prostate cancer patients; the evaluation of prostate-specific antigen and comparison with prostatic acid phosphatase and gamma-seminoprotein].[用于监测前列腺癌患者的肿瘤标志物的临床研究;前列腺特异性抗原的评估以及与前列腺酸性磷酸酶和γ-精浆蛋白的比较]
Nihon Gan Chiryo Gakkai Shi. 1990 Nov 20;25(11):2627-39.
2
[Prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), gamma-seminoprotein (gamma-Sm) and prostate specific antigen (PA) in prostatic cancer].[前列腺癌中的前列腺酸性磷酸酶(PAP)、γ-精浆蛋白(γ-Sm)和前列腺特异性抗原(PA)]
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1988 Aug;34(8):1389-96.
3
[Clinical study of tumor markers in prostatic carcinoma--an investigation on the simultaneous measurement of prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP), prostatic antigen (PA) and gamma-seminoprotein (gamma-Sm)].前列腺癌肿瘤标志物的临床研究——前列腺酸性磷酸酶(PAP)、前列腺抗原(PA)和γ-精浆蛋白(γ-Sm)同步检测的调查
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1988 Jun;34(6):987-95.
4
[Clinical study of tumor markers in prostatic cancer].[前列腺癌肿瘤标志物的临床研究]
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1990 Apr;36(4):425-31.
5
[Clinical significance of tumor markers in prostatic carcinoma--comparative study of prostatic acid phosphatase, prostate specific antigen and gamma-seminoprotein].[肿瘤标志物在前列腺癌中的临床意义——前列腺酸性磷酸酶、前列腺特异性抗原和γ-精浆蛋白的比较研究]
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1987 Dec;33(12):2044-9.
6
[Clinical evaluation of serum prostatic specific antigen in prostatic cancer: simultaneous assays of prostatic specific antigen, gamma-seminoprotein and prostatic acid phosphatase in 113 newly diagnosed patients with prostatic cancer].前列腺癌中血清前列腺特异性抗原的临床评估:对113例新诊断前列腺癌患者同时检测前列腺特异性抗原、γ-精浆蛋白和前列腺酸性磷酸酶
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1989 Sep;35(9):1519-28.
7
[The significance of serum prostate-specific antigen, gamma-seminoprotein and prostatic acid phosphatase as prostate cancer markers].[血清前列腺特异性抗原、γ-精浆蛋白和前列腺酸性磷酸酶作为前列腺癌标志物的意义]
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1989 Jun;35(6):987-91.
8
[Changes in prostatic acid phosphatase, gamma-seminoprotein and prostate specific antigen after endocrine therapy for stage D2 prostate cancer].[D2期前列腺癌内分泌治疗后前列腺酸性磷酸酶、γ-精浆蛋白和前列腺特异性抗原的变化]
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1990 Jul;36(7):783-91.
9
[Role of gamma-seminoprotein (gamma-SM) and prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) as tumor markers of prostatic cancer].[γ-精蛋白(γ-SM)和前列腺酸性磷酸酶(PAP)作为前列腺癌肿瘤标志物的作用]
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1988 Dec;34(12):2135-41.
10
[Prostate specific antigen in serum of the patients with prostatic cancer].[前列腺癌患者血清中的前列腺特异性抗原]
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1988 Apr;34(4):636-42.