Houseknecht Karen L, Robertson Alan S, Zavadoski William, Gibbs E Michael, Johnson David E, Rollema Hans
Department of Cardiovascular, Metabolic & Endocrine Diseases, Pfizer Global Research and Development, Groton, CT 06340, USA.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2007 Feb;32(2):289-97. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301209. Epub 2006 Oct 11.
Although it is generally accepted that atypical antipsychotics differ in their risk for diabetic side effects, the underlying pharmacological mechanisms are unknown. Studies on the mechanisms of antipsychotic-induced hyperglycemia or insulin resistance are often confounded by the concomitant weight gain and dyslipidemia, known diabetic risk factors. To investigate whether antipsychotics can acutely cause metabolic effects before any change in body composition, we studied the effects of four atypical antipsychotics on whole-body insulin resistance. Using the hyperinsulinemic, euglycemic clamp technique in conscious rats, insulin and somatostatin were infused at a constant rate to provide constant hyperinsulinemia and to suppress pancreatic insulin secretion. Glucose was infused at a variable rate, adjusted to maintain euglycemia. At steady state, animals were administered vehicle (V) or antipsychotic and the glucose infusion rate was monitored as an index of insulin sensitivity. Clamp experiments using radiotracers and studies on glucose uptake into isolated skeletal muscle were conducted to differentiate between effects on hepatic glucose production (HGP) and on peripheral glucose uptake. Olanzapine (OLAN) and clozapine (CLOZ) acutely impaired whole-body insulin sensitivity in a dose-dependent manner (P<0.001 vs V), whereas ziprasidone and risperidone had no effect. CLOZ also induced profound insulin resistance after dosing 10 mg/kg/day for 5 days (P<0.05 vs V). Tracer studies indicated that acute changes mainly reflect increased HGP, consistent with the lack of effect on glucose uptake. OLAN and CLOZ can thus rapidly induce marked insulin resistance, which could contribute to the hyperglycemia and ketoacidosis reported for patients receiving those therapies.
虽然人们普遍认为非典型抗精神病药物引发糖尿病副作用的风险存在差异,但其潜在的药理机制尚不清楚。抗精神病药物所致高血糖或胰岛素抵抗机制的研究常常因伴随的体重增加和血脂异常(已知的糖尿病风险因素)而受到干扰。为了研究抗精神病药物在身体成分发生任何变化之前是否能急性引起代谢效应,我们研究了四种非典型抗精神病药物对全身胰岛素抵抗的影响。在清醒大鼠中使用高胰岛素-正常血糖钳夹技术,以恒定速率输注胰岛素和生长抑素,以提供持续的高胰岛素血症并抑制胰腺胰岛素分泌。以可变速率输注葡萄糖,并进行调整以维持正常血糖。在稳态时,给动物施用赋形剂(V)或抗精神病药物,并监测葡萄糖输注速率作为胰岛素敏感性的指标。进行了使用放射性示踪剂的钳夹实验以及对分离的骨骼肌葡萄糖摄取的研究,以区分对肝葡萄糖生成(HGP)和外周葡萄糖摄取的影响。奥氮平(OLAN)和氯氮平(CLOZ)以剂量依赖性方式急性损害全身胰岛素敏感性(与V相比,P<0.001),而齐拉西酮和利培酮则无影响。CLOZ在以10mg/kg/天给药5天后也诱导了严重的胰岛素抵抗(与V相比,P<0.05)。示踪剂研究表明,急性变化主要反映HGP增加,这与对葡萄糖摄取缺乏影响一致。因此,OLAN和CLOZ可迅速诱导明显的胰岛素抵抗,这可能导致接受这些治疗的患者出现高血糖和酮症酸中毒。