Giglioli Cristina, Margheri Massimo, Valente Serafina, Comeglio Marco, Lazzeri Chiara, Chechi Tania, Armentano Corinna, Romano Salvatore Mario, Falai Massimilano, Gensini Gian Franco
Coronary Care Unit, Instituto di Clinica Medica Generale e Cardiologia, Florence, Italy.
Can J Cardiol. 2006 Oct;22(12):1047-52. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(06)70320-8.
At the Istituto di Clinica Medica Generale e Cardiologia (Florence, Italy), the widespread use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has markedly changed the hospital course of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). These patients are typically transferred to the coronary care unit (CCU) only after primary PCI, whereas during the thrombolytic era, patients were first admitted to CCU before reperfusion.
The incidence, timing and setting of complications from symptom onset to hospital discharge in 689 consecutive AMI patients undergoing PCI were evaluated.
Ventricular fibrillation occurred in 11% of patients, and most episodes (94.7%) occurred before or during PCI. Of all patients, 6.3% developed complete atrioventricular block (CAVB), and in 86.3% of these cases, the CAVB occurred before or during PCI; in 94.5%, a CAVB resolution occurred in the catheterization laboratory (CL). Thirty-one patients (4.5%) had impending shock on admission to the CL. Cardiogenic shock developed in 2 9 patients (4.2%), mostly in the prehospital phase or in the CL. Only four patients (less than 1%) developed cardiogenic shock later during their hospital course. Similarly, circulatory and ventilatory support, as well as temporary pacing and cardiac defibrillation, were used mostly in the prehospital phase or in the CL. During the CCU stay, 45 patients (6.5%) had hemorrhagic or vascular complications, and the incidence of post-PCI ischemia and early reocclusion of the culprit vessel were low (2.1% and 0.6%, respectively). Thus, cardiac complications usually associated with AMI were observed mainly before hospital admission or in the CL during the reopening of the target vessel. These complications were rarely observed after a successful PCI.
For AMI patients, the CL is not only the site of PCI, it is also where most life-threatening cardiac complications are observed and treated.
在意大利佛罗伦萨的综合临床与心脏病学研究所,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的广泛应用显著改变了急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者的住院病程。这些患者通常仅在接受直接PCI后才被转入冠心病监护病房(CCU),而在溶栓治疗时代,患者在再灌注之前首先被收入CCU。
评估689例接受PCI的连续AMI患者从症状发作到出院的并发症发生率、发生时间及情况。
11%的患者发生室颤,大多数发作(94.7%)发生在PCI之前或期间。所有患者中,6.3%发生完全性房室传导阻滞(CAVB),其中86.3%的病例CAVB发生在PCI之前或期间;94.5%的病例在导管室(CL)实现了CAVB的恢复。31例患者(4.5%)在进入CL时出现即将发生休克的情况。29例患者(4.2%)发生心源性休克,大多发生在院前阶段或CL。仅有4例患者(不到1%)在住院病程后期发生心源性休克。同样,循环和呼吸支持以及临时起搏和心脏除颤大多在院前阶段或CL使用。在CCU住院期间,45例患者(6.5%)出现出血或血管并发症,PCI后缺血和罪犯血管早期再闭塞的发生率较低(分别为2.1%和0.6%)。因此,通常与AMI相关的心脏并发症主要在入院前或目标血管再通期间在CL观察到。这些并发症在PCI成功后很少观察到。
对于AMI患者,CL不仅是PCI的场所,也是大多数危及生命的心脏并发症被观察和治疗的地方。