Suppr超能文献

评估学生反思性写作以寻找批判性思维的证据。

The evaluation of students' reflective writing for evidence of critical thinking.

作者信息

Kennison Monica Metrick

机构信息

West Liberty State College, West Liberty, West Virginia, USA.

出版信息

Nurs Educ Perspect. 2006 Sep-Oct;27(5):269-73.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to establish interrater reliability of the Critical Thinking Scale (CTS), a teacher-accessible tool designed to measure the critical thinking of baccalaureate nursing students as evidenced in their reflective writing about their practice experiences.The study is an extension of an earlier pilot test of the CTS. Graduating students from a nursing program at a small liberal arts college were asked to write about a significant practice experience encountered during their last clinical course. Three teachers used the CTS to independently evaluate the students' writing. California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST) scores provided a standard measure of critical thinking. Results indicated statistically significant positive relationships between the CCTST total critical thinking score and mean teacher ratings using the CTS. Meaningfully significant interrater reliability ratings for the CTS were also found. With further development, the CTS has promise as an appropriate tool to evaluate students' reflective writing for evidence of critical thinking.

摘要

本研究的目的是建立批判性思维量表(CTS)的评分者间信度,这是一种教师可用的工具,旨在通过本科护理专业学生关于实践经历的反思性写作来衡量其批判性思维。该研究是CTS早期试点测试的延伸。一所小型文理学院护理专业的应届毕业生被要求撰写他们在最后一门临床课程中遇到的重要实践经历。三位教师使用CTS独立评估学生的写作。加利福尼亚批判性思维技能测试(CCTST)分数提供了批判性思维的标准衡量指标。结果表明,CCTST总批判性思维分数与教师使用CTS的平均评分之间存在统计学上显著的正相关关系。还发现了CTS具有显著意义的评分者间信度评级。随着进一步发展,CTS有望成为评估学生反思性写作以获取批判性思维证据的合适工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验