• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[医疗风险管理]

[Medical risk management].

作者信息

Zipper Stephan G

机构信息

Katharina-Kasper-Kliniken gGmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Gutachter- und Schlichtungsstelle bei der Landesärztekammer Hessen, Frankfurt am Main.

出版信息

Med Klin (Munich). 2006 Oct 15;101(10):796-803. doi: 10.1007/s00063-006-1107-8.

DOI:10.1007/s00063-006-1107-8
PMID:17039322
Abstract

An error-control management (management of technical errors) is well established, tested and approved in sectors of high risk, such as aviation and nuclear industry. Although medical science likewise represents a sector of high risk, a similar region-wide control management is still missing. The reasons are multifaceted: by implementation of an error-control management, the negotiation of psychological obstacles and the investment of financial resources have to be faced. The profit from overcoming these obstacles is gained only in the long term. The intention of this survey is to give an overview of the current state of knowledge of errors in medical science as well as to give an introduction (adoption) of the basic principles of systemic error description, detection and prevention by evaluating the available studies.

摘要

错误控制管理(技术错误管理)在航空和核工业等高风险领域已得到充分确立、测试和批准。尽管医学同样属于高风险领域,但类似的全区域控制管理仍然缺失。原因是多方面的:实施错误控制管理必须面对心理障碍的克服和财政资源的投入。克服这些障碍所带来的收益只能在长期内实现。本次调查的目的是概述医学领域错误的当前知识状况,并通过评估现有研究介绍(采用)系统错误描述、检测和预防的基本原则。

相似文献

1
[Medical risk management].[医疗风险管理]
Med Klin (Munich). 2006 Oct 15;101(10):796-803. doi: 10.1007/s00063-006-1107-8.
2
[Experiences with the critical incident reporting systems].[重大事件报告系统的经验]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(1):49-50. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.01.006. Epub 2014 Feb 16.
3
[The implementation of risk management in a department of otolaryngology].[耳鼻喉科风险管理的实施]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2011 Sep;90(9):548-53. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1280831. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
4
[Can the planning process for the mental health system in Germany follow scientific principles?].德国心理健康系统的规划过程能遵循科学原则吗?
Psychiatr Prax. 2004 Nov;31(8):383-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-828331.
5
Strategies to increase reporting of near misses and adverse events.
J Nurs Care Qual. 2007 Apr-Jun;22(2):102-6. doi: 10.1097/01.NCQ.0000263097.83439.68.
6
FMEA: a model for reducing medical errors.失效模式与效应分析:一种减少医疗差错的模型
Clin Chim Acta. 2009 Jun;404(1):75-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2009.03.015. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
7
[Incident reporting as a tool for error analysis in medicine].[事件报告作为医学错误分析的工具]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2001 Jul;95(7):479-84.
8
[Risk management project: reactive or proactive approach?].[风险管理项目:被动式还是主动式方法?]
Ig Sanita Pubbl. 2006 Sep-Oct;62(5):493-508.
9
[The German program for disease management guidelines--implementation with pathways and quality management].[德国疾病管理指南项目——通过路径和质量管理实施]
Med Klin (Munich). 2007 Jul 15;102(7):565-9. doi: 10.1007/s00063-007-1087-3.
10
[Critical Incident Reporting System (CIRS)].[重大事件报告系统(CIRS)]
Med Klin (Munich). 2007 Nov 15;102(11):936-8. doi: 10.1007/s00063-007-1118-0.