Cohen Noam A
Division of Rhinology, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, 5 Silverstein/Ravdin, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 2006 Sep;196:20-6. doi: 10.1177/00034894061150s904.
Although much has been elucidated in the past 170 years concerning the precise mechanism of ciliary function in the healthy or diseased human respiratory system, significant questions remain. The first description of ciliary action is credited to Sharpey in 1835. However, the importance of mucosal function was not apparent until Hilding's investigations of the postsurgical canine sinus demonstrated scar formation and disruption of mucociliary clearance. Subsequently, several techniques for mucosal coverage of exposed bone, most notably by Sewall and Boyden, were reported. The underlying physiology explaining the importance of the mucosa and the concept of mucosal preservation became apparent with the description of the sinonasal mucociliary flow patterns by Messerklinger; and thus the restoration of natural sinus physiology, ie, mucociliary clearance, became the goal of both medical and surgical treatment of sinonasal inflammatory disease. Clearance of benign and pathological substances in the mucus is governed by the propulsive force of the beating cilia and the physical characteristics of the overlying mucus. The respiratory cilia continually beat in a coordinated fashion, and in times of stress (eg, exercise, infection, or fever) ciliary beat frequency increases to accelerate mucus clearance. Thus, upper airway ciliary motility is under dynamic modulation. Multiple investigations incontrovertibly demonstrate a marked decrease in sinonasal mucociliary clearance in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Possible explanations for this finding are 1) a reduced basal ciliary beat frequency, 2) an alteration of the viscoelastic properties of airway secretions, and/or 3) a blunted dynamic response of sinonasal cilia to environmental stimuli. Studies of the first two explanations yield conflicting results, and to date, the third possibility remains uninvestigated. A review of the current understanding of the cellular regulation of respiratory ciliary activity and its contribution to chronic rhinosinusitis is presented.
尽管在过去170年里,关于健康或患病人类呼吸系统中纤毛功能的确切机制已阐明了许多,但仍存在重大问题。纤毛活动的首次描述归功于1835年的夏普伊。然而,直到希尔丁对术后犬鼻窦的研究表明有瘢痕形成和黏液纤毛清除功能破坏,黏膜功能的重要性才显现出来。随后,报道了几种用于覆盖暴露骨的黏膜技术,最著名的是由休厄尔和博伊登提出的。随着梅塞尔克林格对鼻窦黏液纤毛流动模式的描述,解释黏膜重要性的潜在生理学以及黏膜保护的概念变得清晰起来;因此,恢复自然鼻窦生理功能,即黏液纤毛清除功能,成为鼻窦炎性疾病药物和手术治疗的目标。黏液中良性和病理性物质的清除受摆动纤毛的推进力和覆盖其上的黏液的物理特性支配。呼吸纤毛持续以协调的方式摆动,在压力状态下(如运动、感染或发烧),纤毛摆动频率增加以加速黏液清除。因此,上呼吸道纤毛运动处于动态调节之下。多项研究无可争议地表明,慢性鼻窦炎患者的鼻窦黏液纤毛清除功能明显下降。这一发现的可能解释是:1)基础纤毛摆动频率降低;2)气道分泌物黏弹性特性改变;和/或3)鼻窦纤毛对环境刺激的动态反应减弱。对前两种解释的研究结果相互矛盾,迄今为止,第三种可能性仍未得到研究。本文综述了目前对呼吸纤毛活动的细胞调节及其对慢性鼻窦炎的影响的理解。