Suppr超能文献

医学生参加非必修讲座的情况。

Medical student attendance at non-compulsory lectures.

作者信息

Mattick Karen, Crocker Graham, Bligh John

机构信息

Peninsula Medical School, Institute of Clinical Education, EX1 2LU, Exeter, UK.

出版信息

Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2007 May;12(2):201-10. doi: 10.1007/s10459-005-5492-1. Epub 2006 Oct 14.

Abstract

The General Medical Council in the UK recommends that undergraduate medical students be exposed to a variety of learning opportunities and increasingly take responsibility for their own learning. This study presents quantitative and qualitative data relating to attendance at non-compulsory plenary lectures in order to understand factors affecting the value placed by students on this component of the first 2 years of a contemporary medical curriculum. Attendance data were available for 87% first year and 78% second year plenary lectures. There was no difference in attendance at lectures that were delivered telematically to a remote site when compared with those where the speaker was present. There were markedly more students attending lectures at the beginning of the first academic year, with numbers decreasing as the year progressed. More first year students attended lectures on biomedical science and clinically focussed topics than on human science and public health whereas second year student attendance was similar across topics. Reasons given for non-attendance at plenary sessions fell into "student-related" factors (e.g. dislike of lecture-based learning) and "teaching-related" factors (e.g. perceived variable quality of lectures). This study confirms that some students value lectures highly as a method to supplement other learning opportunities, whereas others find they learn better by other means.

摘要

英国医学总会建议,本科医学生应接触各种学习机会,并越来越多地对自己的学习负责。本研究提供了与非必修全体讲座出勤率相关的定量和定性数据,以便了解影响学生对当代医学课程前两年这一组成部分重视程度的因素。一年级全体讲座的出勤率数据为87%,二年级为78%。与演讲者在场的讲座相比,通过远程方式向远程地点进行的讲座出勤率没有差异。在第一学年开始时,参加讲座的学生明显更多,随着学年的推进,人数逐渐减少。与人文科学和公共卫生主题的讲座相比,更多一年级学生参加生物医学科学和临床重点主题的讲座,而二年级学生在各主题上的出勤率相似。不参加全体会议的原因分为“与学生相关”的因素(如不喜欢基于讲座的学习)和“与教学相关”的因素(如认为讲座质量参差不齐)。本研究证实,一些学生高度重视讲座,将其作为补充其他学习机会的一种方式,而另一些学生则发现通过其他方式学习效果更好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验