Nagappan Palaniappan Ganesh, Tan Sapphire Rou Xi, Absar Shazia, Brown Samuel, Sayers Sarah, McManus Alex, Arora Anmol, Kuhn Isla, Khan Faris, Lau Edward, Tulinius Charlotte
School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
BMJ Open. 2025 May 19;15(5):e091768. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091768.
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on medical education, with many institutions shifting to online learning to ensure the safety of students and staff. However, there appears to be a decline in in-person attendance at medical schools across the UK and worldwide following the relaxation of social distancing rules and the reinstatement of in-person teaching. Importantly, this trend was also observed before the pandemic. While reflected within the literature, there is currently no systematic review describing these changes. We aim to find out how medical students' attendance is changing as documented within the literature and its impact on their educational outcomes.
This systematic review followed the guidelines of the Centre of Research and Dissemination, Moose and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. We searched the major databases of Medline via Ovid, Embase via Ovid, Scopus, Web of Science, British Education Index via EBSCOhost and ERIC via EBSCOhost in September 2023. Two reviewers independently screened each paper and extracted the data, with a third reviewer for dispute resolution. All studies reporting on medical students from various universities, both graduate and undergraduate, and describing changes in attendance and/or students' educational outcomes were included. Risk of bias in individual studies was assessed using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality tool. A narrative synthesis of the findings from all included studies was done.
12 papers were included in the analysis.
Of the eight papers that measured attendance data over more than one academic year, only one paper demonstrated a statistically significant decrease while one paper demonstrated a statistically significant increase in attendance over the observational period. Other papers either did not perform statistical tests or did not demonstrate statistical significance. Secondary aims: Most papers showed a general positive correlation between attendance and educational outcomes. No studies explicitly explored reasons for changes in attendance seen. Only one paper outlined a possible strategy to address changes in attendance, a mandatory attendance policy, which has mixed outcomes.
Despite widespread anecdotally reported attendance decline post-COVID-19, overall, there was no consistent change in attendance noted. However, there was a large heterogeneity in the studies included. Further research is required to elucidate trends in attendance and its impact on medical education.
新冠疫情对医学教育产生了重大影响,许多院校转向在线学习以确保学生和教职员工的安全。然而,在社交距离规定放宽和恢复面对面教学后,英国乃至全球医学院校的现场出勤人数似乎有所下降。重要的是,这一趋势在疫情之前就已出现。虽然文献中有相关反映,但目前尚无系统综述描述这些变化。我们旨在了解医学文献中记录的医学生出勤情况是如何变化的,以及这对他们的教育成果有何影响。
本系统综述遵循研究与传播中心、MOOSE以及系统综述和Meta分析的首选报告项目的指南。我们于2023年9月在Ovid平台检索了Medline的主要数据库、在Ovid平台检索了Embase、检索了Scopus、Web of Science、通过EBSCOhost检索了英国教育索引以及通过EBSCOhost检索了教育资源信息中心。两名评审员独立筛选每篇论文并提取数据,第三名评审员负责解决争议。纳入所有报告来自不同大学的医学生(包括研究生和本科生)且描述出勤变化和/或学生教育成果的研究。使用医疗保健研究与质量机构的工具评估个别研究的偏倚风险。对所有纳入研究的结果进行了叙述性综合分析。
12篇论文纳入分析。
在八篇测量一个以上学年出勤数据的论文中,只有一篇论文显示在观察期内出勤人数有统计学意义的下降,而一篇论文显示出勤人数有统计学意义的增加。其他论文要么未进行统计检验,要么未显示出统计学意义。次要目的:大多数论文显示出勤与教育成果之间总体呈正相关。没有研究明确探讨出勤变化的原因。只有一篇论文概述了应对出勤变化的可能策略,即强制出勤政策,其效果不一。
尽管有大量轶事报道称新冠疫情后出勤人数下降,但总体而言,未发现出勤情况有一致变化。然而,纳入的研究存在很大异质性。需要进一步研究以阐明出勤趋势及其对医学教育的影响。