Call Jason, Sacrinty Matthew, Applegate Robert, Little William, Santos Renato, Baki Talal, Gandhi Sanjay, Kahl Frederic, Kutcher Michael
Winchester Cardiology & Internal Medicine, Inc., Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
J Invasive Cardiol. 2006 Oct;18(10):469-74.
To evaluate the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) with the use of an automated contrast injection system in conjunction with contemporary measures to prevent CIN after cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
The use of automated contrast injection systems can reduce the volume of procedural contrast, but whether lower contrast volume is associated with a lower incidence of CIN is uncertain.
The incidence of CIN was assessed in 1,798 patients after diagnostic catheterization or PCI at Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center from April 2002 to November 2004 using traditional handheld manifold injection systems, and in 377 subsequent patients using an automated contrast injection system. Preprocedural hydration was used on a routine basis, and N-acetylcysteine and bicarbonate infusion were used on an ad hoc basis. Outcomes were adjusted by standard logistic regression modeling.
Mean contrast volume (+/- standard deviation) per case was reduced from 204 +/- 147 ml to 146 +/- 108 ml, p < 0.05 by use of automated contrast injection. The incidence of CIN was 19.3% using manifold injection, and was 13.3%, p < 0.05, after use of automated contrast injection. The use of automated contrast injection was associated with a reduced relative risk of CIN, 0.66 (0.47-0.93), compared to manual injection, even after adjustment for baseline clinical and procedural covariates.
The use of an automated contrast injection system in conjunction with contemporary hydration and pharmacologic strategies to prevent CIN during diagnostic catheterization and PCI was associated with a significant reduction in the use of contrast volume, as well as in the incidence of CIN.
评估在心脏导管插入术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后,使用自动造影剂注射系统结合当代预防造影剂肾病(CIN)的措施时CIN的发生率。
使用自动造影剂注射系统可减少术中造影剂用量,但较低的造影剂用量是否与较低的CIN发生率相关尚不确定。
2002年4月至2004年11月,在维克森林大学浸信会医学中心,对1798例诊断性导管插入术或PCI术后患者使用传统手持多通管注射系统评估CIN发生率,对随后的377例患者使用自动造影剂注射系统评估。术前常规进行水化治疗,必要时使用N-乙酰半胱氨酸和碳酸氢盐输注。通过标准逻辑回归模型对结果进行校正。
使用自动造影剂注射后,每例患者的平均造影剂用量(±标准差)从204±147ml降至146±108ml,p<0.05。使用多通管注射时CIN发生率为19.3%,使用自动造影剂注射后为13.3%,p<0.05。即使在对基线临床和手术协变量进行校正后,与手动注射相比,使用自动造影剂注射仍使CIN的相对风险降低,为0.66(0.47-0.93)。
在诊断性导管插入术和PCI期间,使用自动造影剂注射系统结合当代水化和药物策略预防CIN,可显著减少造影剂用量以及CIN的发生率。