Zee Kwan-Yat, Lee Dae-Hyun, Corbet Esmonde F
Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Prince Philip Dental Hospital 34 Hospital Road, Hong Kong.
J Int Acad Periodontol. 2006 Oct;8(4):125-35.
The aims of the present study were to evaluate the clinical efficacy of, and to monitor microbiologically, repeated oral hygiene instructions alone or in combination with metronidazole 25% gel or subgingival scaling with or without metronidazole gel in treatment of new, residual or recurrent periodontal pockets in previously treated adult periodontitis patients. Ten suitable patients were included in this randomized single-blind clinical study with an intra-individual design. Clinical parameters were measured before and at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after treatment. Subgingival plaque samples were taken at every examination from one selected site in each quadrant. Smears from plaque samples were silver-stained and differential counting was performed under light microscopy at 1000X magnification. Four treatment modalities: (i) oral hygiene instruction (OHI) alone; (ii) OHI and metronidazole dental gel; (iii) OHI and subgingival scaling; (iv) OHI and subgingival scaling plus metronidazole gel, were randomly assigned to one quadrant of each patient. At the 12-month examination, the mean reductions in probing pocket depth were 2.6 mm after OHI alone, 2.8 mm after OHI and metronidazole gel, 3.3 mm after OHI and subgingival scaling and 2.6 mm after oral OHI and subgingival scaling plus metronidazole gel. The mean gains in probing attachment level were 2.2 mm, 1.9 mm, 2.7 mm and 1.6 mm, respectively. Although there were statistically significant differences in treatment responses between some treatment modalities at some time points, these were not considered to be clinically significant. Differential counts showed a shift towards a healthy microflora in response to all treatment modalities. From the 12-month results, it was concluded that the metronidazole 25% gel produced positive effects on the clinical parameters and on the subgingival plaque microbiological composition in new, residual or recurrent pockets in previously treated chronic periodontitis patients. However, the metronidazole gel alone or in combination with scaling does not seem to have any additional clinically significant therapeutic effects over and above those derived from improved oral hygiene resulting from monthly recalls, with or without subgingival scaling.
本研究的目的是评估单独反复进行口腔卫生指导,或联合使用25%甲硝唑凝胶,或龈下刮治(无论是否联合甲硝唑凝胶),对曾接受治疗的成年牙周炎患者新出现的、残留的或复发性牙周袋的临床疗效,并进行微生物学监测。本随机单盲临床研究采用个体内设计,纳入了10例合适的患者。在治疗前以及治疗后1、3、6、9和12个月测量临床参数。每次检查时,从每个象限中选定的一个部位采集龈下菌斑样本。菌斑样本涂片进行银染色,并在1000倍放大倍数下于光学显微镜下进行鉴别计数。四种治疗方式:(i)单纯口腔卫生指导(OHI);(ii)OHI和甲硝唑牙科凝胶;(iii)OHI和龈下刮治;(iv)OHI和龈下刮治加甲硝唑凝胶,被随机分配到每位患者的一个象限。在12个月的检查中,单纯OHI后探诊袋深度的平均减少量为2.6mm,OHI和甲硝唑凝胶后为2.8mm,OHI和龈下刮治后为3.3mm,OHI和龈下刮治加甲硝唑凝胶后为2.6mm。探诊附着水平的平均增加量分别为2.2mm、1.9mm、2.7mm和1.6mm。尽管在某些时间点,某些治疗方式之间的治疗反应存在统计学上的显著差异,但这些差异不被认为具有临床意义。鉴别计数显示,所有治疗方式均使微生物群落向健康菌群转变。从12个月的结果得出结论,25%甲硝唑凝胶对曾接受治疗的慢性牙周炎患者新出现的、残留的或复发性牙周袋的临床参数和龈下菌斑微生物组成产生了积极影响。然而,单独使用甲硝唑凝胶或与刮治联合使用,似乎并没有比每月复诊(无论是否进行龈下刮治)所带来的口腔卫生改善产生的治疗效果有任何额外的临床显著疗效。