Tomasino Stephen F, Hamilton Martin A
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Microbiology Laboratory, Environmental Science Center, Ft. Meade, MD, USA.
J AOAC Int. 2006 Sep-Oct;89(5):1373-97.
In an effort to improve AOAC Method 966.04, the Sporicidal Activity of Disinfectants Test, selected modifications to the procedure were evaluated in a collaborative study. Method 966.04 is used to generate efficacy data to support the product registration of sporicides and sterilants. The method is a carrier-based test that provides a qualitative measure of product efficacy against spores of Bacillus subtilis and Clostridium sporogenes. The use of garden soil extract and the lack of standard procedures for the enumeration of spores and neutralization of the test chemicals have been considered problematic for many years. The proposed modifications were limited to the B. subtilis and hard surface carrier (porcelain penicylinder) components of the method. The study included the evaluation of a replacement for soil extract nutrient broth and an establishment of a minimum spore titer per carrier, both considered crucial for the improvement and utilization of the method. Additionally, an alternative hard surface material and a neutralization confirmation procedure were evaluated. To determine the equivalence of the proposed alternatives to the standard method, 3 medium/carrier combinations, (1) soil extract nutrient broth/porcelain carrier (current method), (2) nutrient agar amended with 5 microg/mL manganese sulfate/porcelain carrier, and (3) nutrient agar amended with 5 microg/mL manganese sulfate/stainless steel carrier were analyzed for carrier counts, HCI resistance, efficacy, quantitative efficacy, and spore wash-off. The test chemicals used in the study represent 3 chemical classes and are commercially available antimicrobial liquid products: sodium hypochlorite (bleach), glutaraldehyde, and a combination of peracetic acid and hydrogen peroxide. Four laboratories participated in the study. The results of the spore titer per carrier, HCI resistance, efficacy, and wash-off studies demonstrate that amended nutrient agar in conjunction with the porcelain is comparable to the current method, soil extract nutrient broth/porcelain. The nutrient agar method is simple, inexpensive, reproducible, and provides an ample supply of high quality spores. Due to the current use of porcelain carriers for testing C. sporogenes, it is advisable to retain the use of porcelain carriers until stainless steel can be evaluated as a replacement carrier material for Clostridium. The evaluation of stainless steel for Clostridium has been initiated by the Study Director. Study Director recommendations for First Action revisions are provided in a modified method.
为改进AOAC方法966.04“消毒剂的杀孢子活性测试”,在一项协作研究中对该程序的选定修改进行了评估。方法966.04用于生成效力数据,以支持杀孢子剂和灭菌剂的产品注册。该方法是一种基于载体的测试,可对产品针对枯草芽孢杆菌和产芽孢梭菌孢子的效力提供定性测量。多年来,使用花园土壤提取物以及缺乏孢子计数和测试化学品中和的标准程序一直被认为存在问题。提议的修改仅限于该方法的枯草芽孢杆菌和硬表面载体(瓷制笔管)部分。该研究包括评估土壤提取物营养肉汤的替代品以及确定每个载体的最低孢子滴度,这两者都被认为对该方法的改进和应用至关重要。此外,还评估了一种替代硬表面材料和一种中和确认程序。为确定提议的替代方法与标准方法的等效性,对3种培养基/载体组合进行了分析,即(1)土壤提取物营养肉汤/瓷载体(现行方法)、(2)添加5μg/mL硫酸锰的营养琼脂/瓷载体,以及(3)添加5μg/mL硫酸锰的营养琼脂/不锈钢载体,分析内容包括载体计数、耐盐酸性、效力、定量效力和孢子洗脱。研究中使用的测试化学品代表3种化学类别,是市售抗菌液体产品:次氯酸钠(漂白剂)、戊二醛以及过氧乙酸和过氧化氢的组合。四个实验室参与了该研究。每个载体的孢子滴度、耐盐酸性、效力和洗脱研究结果表明,添加了营养琼脂的瓷载体与现行方法土壤提取物营养肉汤/瓷载体相当。营养琼脂方法简单、廉价、可重复,并且能提供充足的高质量孢子。由于目前使用瓷载体测试产芽孢梭菌,在不锈钢可被评估为产芽孢梭菌的替代载体材料之前,建议保留瓷载体的使用。研究主任已开始对不锈钢用于产芽孢梭菌的评估。研究主任对首次行动修订的建议在一种修改后的方法中给出。