Moncino M D, Roche P A, Pizzo S V
Department of Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
Biochemistry. 1991 Feb 12;30(6):1545-51. doi: 10.1021/bi00220a015.
We compared the physicochemical characteristics of alpha 2-macroglobulin (alpha 2M) monomers produced by limited reduction and carboxamidomethylation to those of the naturally occurring monomeric alpha-macroglobulin homologue rat alpha 1-inhibitor 3 (alpha 1 I3). Unlike alpha 1 I3, alpha 2 M monomers fail to inhibit proteolysis of the high molecular weight substrate hide powder azure by trypsin. In contrast to alpha 1 I3, which remains monomeric after reacting with proteinase, alpha 2 M monomers reassociate to higher molecular weight species (dimers, trimers, and tetramers) after reacting with proteinase. Reaction of alpha 2 M monomers at molar ratios of proteinase to alpha 2M monomers as low as 0.3:1 leads to extensive reassociation and is accompanied by complete bait-region and thiolester bond cleavage. During the reaction of alpha 2M monomers with proteinases, the proteinase binds to the reassociating alpha 2M subunits but is not inhibited. Of significance, all the bound proteinase was covalently linked to the reassociated alpha 2M species. Treatment of alpha 2M monomers with methylamine results in thiolester bond cleavage but minimal reassociation. Treatment of alpha 2M monomers with methylamine followed by proteinase results in complete bait-region cleavage and is accompanied by marked reassociation of alpha 2M monomers to higher molecular weight species. However, no proteinase is associated with these higher molecular weight forms. We infer that bait-region cleavage is more important than thiolester bond cleavage in driving alpha 2M monomers to reassociate. Despite many similarities between alpha 1I3 and alpha 2M monomers, significant differences must exist with respect to proteinase orientation within the inhibitor to account for the failure of alpha 2M monomers to protect large molecular weight substrates from proteolysis by bound proteinase, in contrast to the naturally occurring monomeric homologue rat alpha 1 I3.
我们将通过有限还原和羧甲基化产生的α2-巨球蛋白(α2M)单体的物理化学特性与天然存在的单体α-巨球蛋白同系物大鼠α1-抑制剂3(α1I3)的特性进行了比较。与α1I3不同,α2M单体不能抑制胰蛋白酶对高分子量底物皮粉天青的蛋白水解作用。与蛋白酶反应后仍保持单体状态的α1I3相反,α2M单体与蛋白酶反应后会重新缔合为更高分子量的物质(二聚体、三聚体和四聚体)。蛋白酶与α2M单体的摩尔比低至0.3:1时,α2M单体的反应会导致广泛的重新缔合,并伴随着诱饵区和硫酯键的完全裂解。在α2M单体与蛋白酶的反应过程中,蛋白酶与重新缔合的α2M亚基结合,但未被抑制。重要的是,所有结合的蛋白酶都与重新缔合的α2M物质共价连接。用甲胺处理α2M单体导致硫酯键裂解,但重新缔合程度最小。先用甲胺处理α2M单体,然后再用蛋白酶处理,会导致诱饵区完全裂解,并伴随着α2M单体明显重新缔合为更高分子量的物质。然而,这些更高分子量形式中没有蛋白酶与之结合。我们推断,在驱动α2M单体重新缔合方面,诱饵区裂解比硫酯键裂解更重要。尽管α1I3和α2M单体之间有许多相似之处,但在抑制剂内蛋白酶的方向方面必然存在显著差异,以解释α2M单体无法保护高分子量底物免受结合的蛋白酶的蛋白水解作用,这与天然存在的单体同系物大鼠α1I3相反。