Carroll Timothy J, Herbert Robert D, Munn Joanne, Lee Michael, Gandevia Simon C
Health and Exercise Science, School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006 Nov;101(5):1514-22. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00531.2006.
If exercises are performed to increase muscle strength on one side of the body, voluntary strength can increase on the contralateral side. This effect, termed the contralateral strength training effect, is usually measured in homologous muscles. Although known for over a century, most studies have not been designed well enough to show a definitive transfer of strength that could not be explained by factors such as familiarity with the testing. However, an updated meta-analysis of 16 properly controlled studies (range 15-48 training sessions) shows that the size of the contralateral strength training effect is approximately 8% of initial strength or about half the increase in strength of the trained side. This estimate is similar to results of a large, randomized controlled study of training for the elbow flexors (contralateral effect of 7% initial strength or one-quarter of the effect on the trained side). This is likely to reflect increased motoneuron output rather than muscular adaptations, although most methods are insufficiently sensitive to detect small muscle contributions. Two classes of central mechanism are identified. One involves a "spillover" to the control system for the contralateral limb, and the other involves adaptations in the control system for the trained limb that can be accessed by the untrained limb. Cortical, subcortical and spinal levels are all likely to be involved in the "transfer," and none can be excluded with current data. Although the size of the effect is small and may not be clinically significant, study of the phenomenon provides insight into neural mechanisms associated with exercise and training.
如果进行锻炼以增强身体一侧的肌肉力量,对侧的随意力量也会增加。这种效应被称为对侧力量训练效应,通常在同源肌肉中进行测量。尽管这一现象已被发现一个多世纪,但大多数研究的设计并不足以明确显示力量的转移,因为这种转移可能无法用诸如对测试的熟悉程度等因素来解释。然而,一项对16项控制良好的研究(训练次数为15 - 48次)的更新荟萃分析表明,对侧力量训练效应的大小约为初始力量的8%,或约为训练侧力量增加量的一半。这一估计与一项针对肘屈肌训练的大型随机对照研究结果相似(对侧效应为初始力量的7%,或训练侧效应的四分之一)。这可能反映了运动神经元输出的增加,而非肌肉适应性变化,尽管大多数方法对检测微小的肌肉贡献不够敏感。已确定两类中枢机制。一类涉及对侧肢体控制系统的“溢出”,另一类涉及训练肢体控制系统的适应性变化,未训练肢体也可利用这种变化。皮层、皮层下和脊髓水平都可能参与了这种“转移”,目前的数据无法排除任何一个水平的作用。尽管这种效应的大小较小,可能在临床上不具有显著意义,但对这一现象的研究有助于深入了解与运动和训练相关的神经机制。