Suppr超能文献

等长跖屈熟悉过程中的交叉肢体转移。

Cross-limb transfer during isometric plantar flexion familiarization.

作者信息

Krisnan Logeswary, Yusof Ashril, Marathamuthu Suresh, Selvanayagam Victor Selvarajah

机构信息

Faculty of Sports and Exercise Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Institute for Health Behaviour Research, National Institute of Health, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 13;15(1):8620. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93626-w.

Abstract

This study examined the number of contractions required for an isometric plantar flexion familiarization. Twenty-six males were separated into two independent Groups: Group A: where five contractions were initiated on the dominant limb (right) followed by the contralateral limb; and Group B, initiated by the non-dominant limb (left) followed by the dominant limb. Participants carried out a 5-s maximum voluntary contraction (MVC), with an interpolated twitch administered to the tibial nerve. In Group A, both the dominant and non-dominant limbs required two contractions for familiarization, whereas in Group B, the dominant limb required two contractions, and the non-dominant limb required three (p < 0.05). A strong relationship between MVC and voluntary activation (VA) was observed in Group A for the D (r = 0.91, p < 0.05) and in Group B for the ND limb (r = 0.99, p < 0.05). The results demonstrated evidence of cross-limb transfer from the dominant to the non-dominant limb (p < 0.05). This phenomenon implicates central involvement, substantiated by VA responses that mirror the changes in MVC. Practitioners and researchers should consider the impact of cross-limb transfer during a single familiarization session when assessing strength to avoid overestimation of the gains. Future cross-education/cross-limb transfer studies could investigate the central mechanisms involved during familiarization.

摘要

本研究考察了等长跖屈熟悉化所需的收缩次数。26名男性被分为两个独立组:A组:在优势侧肢体(右侧)开始进行5次收缩,然后是对侧肢体;B组:从非优势侧肢体(左侧)开始,然后是优势侧肢体。参与者进行5秒的最大自主收缩(MVC),并对胫神经施加一次插入式单刺激。在A组中,优势侧和非优势侧肢体熟悉化均需要两次收缩,而在B组中,优势侧肢体需要两次收缩,非优势侧肢体需要三次收缩(p<0.05)。在A组中,优势侧肢体的MVC与自主激活(VA)之间存在强相关性(r = 0.91,p<0.05),在B组中,非优势侧肢体的MVC与VA之间也存在强相关性(r = 0.99,p<0.05)。结果表明存在从优势侧肢体向非优势侧肢体的交叉肢体转移证据(p<0.05)。这种现象表明中枢参与其中,VA反应反映了MVC的变化,证实了这一点。从业者和研究人员在评估力量时应考虑单次熟悉化过程中交叉肢体转移的影响,以避免高估增益。未来的交叉训练/交叉肢体转移研究可以调查熟悉化过程中涉及的中枢机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3864/11903993/be060b64bc21/41598_2025_93626_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验