Suppr超能文献

不锈钢和β钛正畸丝材料特性的体外评估。

In-vitro evaluation of the material characteristics of stainless steel and beta-titanium orthodontic wires.

作者信息

Verstrynge Astrid, Van Humbeeck Jan, Willems Guy

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Medicine, School of Dentistry, Oral Pathology and Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Oct;130(4):460-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.12.030.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The exact composition and material properties of the metal alloys used in orthodontics are usually not identified by or even available from manufacturers. This makes meaningful comparisons between wires impossible and is unacceptable with regard to biocompatibility issues. The aim of this study was to investigate the material characteristics of contemporary stainless steel (SS) and beta-titanium (beta-Ti) wires, also known as titanium-molybdenum alloy (TMA), for comparison.

METHODS

Twenty-two different SS and beta-Ti wires, preferably straight wires sized 0.43 x 0.64 mm, (0.017 x 0.025 in) were tested blindly for wire dimensions, chemical compositions, bending and tensile properties, and surface characteristics.

RESULTS

Four chemical compositions were found for the beta-Ti wires: titanium-11.5, molybdenum-6, zirconium-4.5 tin; titanium-3, aluminum-8, vanadium-6, chromium-4, molybdenum-4, zirconium; titanium-6, aluminum-4, vanadium, and titanium-45 niobium. The SS wires were of AISI type 304 or the nickel-free variant BioDur 108. All beta-Ti wires showed high surface roughness values. TMA 02 significantly had the highest E-modulus, TMA 02 and TMA 11 had the highest 0.2% yield strength, TMA 02 had the highest hardness, and TMA 12 was the most ductile wire of the beta-Ti wires. All SS wires showed high 0.2% yield strength, SS 10 significantly had the lowest E-modulus and was the most ductile wire, and SS 08 significantly showed the lowest hardness values of all SS wires.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences were found between SS and beta-Ti wires, but there was little or no difference between the mechanical and physical characteristics tested in each subgroup. However, the morphological analysis clearly demonstrated that the finishing phase (annealing, polishing) of the wires' production process lacks the quality one would expect with regard to good mechanical properties and biocompatibility issues. Accurate specifications are urgently needed concerning the quality of orthodontic wires on the market.

摘要

引言

正畸中使用的金属合金的确切成分和材料特性通常制造商并未明确标识,甚至无法获取。这使得不同金属丝之间无法进行有意义的比较,且在生物相容性问题上是不可接受的。本研究的目的是调查当代不锈钢(SS)和β钛(β-Ti)丝(也称为钛钼合金(TMA))的材料特性,以便进行比较。

方法

对22种不同的SS和β-Ti丝进行盲测,这些丝最好是尺寸为0.43×0.64毫米(0.017×0.025英寸)的直丝,测试其尺寸、化学成分、弯曲和拉伸性能以及表面特性。

结果

发现β-Ti丝有四种化学成分:钛-11.5、钼-6、锆-4.5、锡;钛-3、铝-8、钒-6、铬-4、钼-4、锆;钛-6、铝-4、钒;以及钛-45铌。SS丝为AISI 304型或无镍变体BioDur 108。所有β-Ti丝的表面粗糙度值都很高。TMA 02的弹性模量显著最高,TMA 02和TMA 11的0.2%屈服强度最高,TMA 02硬度最高,TMA 12是β-Ti丝中延展性最好的丝。所有SS丝的0.2%屈服强度都很高,SS 10的弹性模量显著最低且是延展性最好的丝,SS 08在所有SS丝中硬度值显著最低。

结论

SS丝和β-Ti丝之间存在显著差异,但在每个亚组中测试的力学和物理特性之间几乎没有差异。然而,形态分析清楚地表明,金属丝生产过程的精加工阶段(退火、抛光)在良好的力学性能和生物相容性问题方面缺乏应有的质量。迫切需要对市场上正畸丝的质量制定准确的规范。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验