Bongiorni M G, Soldati E, Paperini L, Pozzolini A, Levorato D, Arena G, Pistelli P, Quirino G, Biagini A, Contini C
CNR, Institute of Clinical Physiology, Pisa, Italy.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1990 Dec;13(12 Pt 2):1755-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1990.tb06885.x.
One of the most important problems in rate responsive (RR) pacing is the clinical experimental evaluation of the reliability of various sensors. In particular, it is difficult to test their sensitivity and specificity during daily activity of the patients. Atrial rate, when present and normal, is the most physiological marker of metabolic requirements, but sometimes it is impossible to analyze the P wave in ventricular paced rhythm during routinely performed tests (e.g., ergometric test and 24-hour Holter monitoring). During various physical activities, we monitored atrial electrograms on an esophageal lead on the first channel of a standard Holter tape recorder; on the second channel a surface ECG lead was recorded. We selected 10 patients with high grade heart block and normal sinus node function paced in RR-VVI mode. RR pacing was obtained using various sensors (body activity, blood temperature, spike-T interval, minute ventilation). The good quality of recording allowed an easy evaluation of atrial and ventricular rates. In four cases an appropriate increase in heart rate was documented; sensitivity threshold and/or rate response slope were reprogrammed when indicated. The pacing rate of one patient did not parallel the atrial rate during walking only. In three cases, we observed a delay in the ventricular rate increase, with ventricular rate decreasing at peak exercise despite further atrial rate increase. In the last two patients, we observed inappropriate pacing response; pacing rate increased later and to a lower level than the atrial one. This new method is applied easily and appears reliable to evaluate the response of RR pacemakers to individual metabolic needs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
频率适应性(RR)起搏中最重要的问题之一是对各种传感器可靠性的临床实验评估。特别是,在患者日常活动期间很难测试其敏感性和特异性。心房率在存在且正常时是代谢需求的最生理指标,但在常规检查(如运动试验和24小时动态心电图监测)期间,有时在心室起搏心律中无法分析P波。在各种体育活动期间,我们在标准动态心电图记录仪第一通道的食管导联上监测心房电图;在第二通道记录体表心电图导联。我们选择了10例高度房室传导阻滞且窦房结功能正常并采用RR-VVI模式起搏的患者。使用各种传感器(身体活动、体温、起搏信号-T间期、分钟通气量)实现RR起搏。良好的记录质量便于对心房率和心室率进行评估。在4例患者中记录到心率适当增加;必要时重新设定了敏感性阈值和/或心率反应斜率。仅1例患者在步行时起搏率与心房率不匹配。在3例患者中,我们观察到心室率增加延迟,尽管心房率进一步增加,但在运动峰值时心室率下降。在最后2例患者中,我们观察到不适当的起搏反应;起搏率增加较晚且低于心房率。这种新方法应用简便,似乎能可靠地评估RR起搏器对个体代谢需求的反应。(摘要截选至250字)