Suppr超能文献

QT感知率自适应起搏器线性和非线性算法的随机双盲交叉研究。

A randomized double-blind, cross-over study of the linear and nonlinear algorithms for the QT sensing rate adaptive pacemaker.

作者信息

Baig M W, Green A, Wade G, Kovanci E, Constable P D, Perrins E J

机构信息

Department of Medical Cardiology, General Infirmary, Leeds, England, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1990 Dec;13(12 Pt 2):1802-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1990.tb06894.x.

Abstract

We have compared the pacing rate responses during cardiopulmonary exercise testing in 11 patients (mean 59 years, six female) with implanted QT sensing rate adaptive pacemakers who were randomly programmed to 1-month periods in the linear and nonlinear algorithms using a double-blind, cross-over design. Exercise testing was performed at the end of each month block and symptoms were scored with the MacMaster questionnaire. With exercise, the time to a 10 beats/min increment in rate was significantly less with the nonlinear compared to the linear algorithm (126 sec vs 255 sec, P = 0.02) but there were no significant differences in exercise duration, the peak pacing rate, the peak VO2, the VO2 at the anaerobic threshold or the mean correlation coefficients of the pacing rate VO2 relationship. Rate oscillation occurred in seven patients in the linear algorithm and in two patients in the nonlinear setting. Initial deceleration of the pacing rate at the onset of exercise occurred in seven patients in the linear algorithm and in four patients in the nonlinear setting. The nonlinear algorithm is associated with a faster response time during exercise and fewer instances of rate instability. However, it has not overcome the problem of a dip in the pacing rate at the beginning of exercise. The major difference in the function of the two algorithms is faster initial acceleration with the nonlinear algorithm. This is explained by the significantly higher values of the slope setting at the lower rate limit for the nonlinear versus the linear algorithm (6.3 ms/ms vs 5.1 ms/ms).

摘要

我们比较了11例植入QT感知频率自适应起搏器的患者(平均年龄59岁,6名女性)在心肺运动试验中的起搏频率反应。这些患者采用双盲交叉设计,被随机编程为在线性和非线性算法下各持续1个月。在每个月的试验结束时进行运动测试,并用麦克马斯特问卷对症状进行评分。运动时,与线性算法相比,非线性算法使心率增加10次/分钟的时间显著缩短(126秒对255秒,P = 0.02),但在运动持续时间、起搏峰值频率、峰值VO2、无氧阈值时的VO2或起搏频率与VO2关系的平均相关系数方面无显著差异。在线性算法组中有7例患者出现频率振荡,非线性算法组中有2例患者出现频率振荡。运动开始时起搏频率的初始减速在线性算法组中有7例患者出现,非线性算法组中有4例患者出现。非线性算法与运动期间更快的反应时间和更少的频率不稳定情况相关。然而,它尚未克服运动开始时起搏频率下降的问题。两种算法功能的主要差异在于非线性算法的初始加速更快。这可以通过非线性算法与线性算法在较低频率极限处斜率设置的值显著更高来解释(6.3毫秒/毫秒对5.1毫秒/毫秒)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验