Suppr超能文献

计算神经性厌食症青少年患者能量消耗的预测公式有多准确?

How accurate are predictive formulas calculating energy expenditure in adolescent patients with anorexia nervosa?

作者信息

Cuerda C, Ruiz A, Velasco C, Bretón I, Camblor M, García-Peris P

机构信息

Nutrition Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, c/Doctor Esquerdo 46, 28007 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Nutr. 2007 Feb;26(1):100-6. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2006.09.001. Epub 2006 Oct 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: To compare resting energy expenditure, measured by indirect calorimetry, to values estimated by different predictive formulas in adolescent patients with anorexia nervosa.

METHODS

We studied 22 female in-patients with a mean age of 14.7 years (SD 1.2). Resting energy expenditure was measured by indirect calorimetry (Deltatrac II MBM-200). We compared measured resting energy expenditure to values estimated by several predictive formulas [Fleisch, Harris-Benedict, FAO, Schofield-HW, Schebendach] using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the Bland-Altman method.

RESULTS

Body mass index increased significantly (P<0.001). Measured resting energy expenditure increased during hospitalization (P<0.05). All formulas overestimated resting energy expenditure with respect to indirect calorimetry except the Schebendach formula. The intraclass correlation between indirect calorimetry and the formulas were poor (0.09-0.20). We observed a poor clinical agreement (Bland-Altman).

CONCLUSIONS

Body mass index and resting energy expenditure increased during hospitalization. The majority of the predictive formulas overestimate resting energy expenditure in adolescent patients with anorexia nervosa. Therefore, indirect calorimetry may be a very useful tool for calculating caloric requirements in these patients.

摘要

背景与目的

比较通过间接测热法测量的静息能量消耗与不同预测公式估算的青少年神经性厌食症患者的静息能量消耗值。

方法

我们研究了22名平均年龄为14.7岁(标准差1.2)的女性住院患者。通过间接测热法(Deltatrac II MBM - 200)测量静息能量消耗。我们使用组内相关系数和Bland - Altman方法,将测量的静息能量消耗与几个预测公式[Fleisch、Harris - Benedict、FAO、Schofield - HW、Schebendach]估算的值进行比较。

结果

体重指数显著增加(P<0.001)。住院期间测量的静息能量消耗增加(P<0.05)。除Schebendach公式外,所有公式相对于间接测热法均高估了静息能量消耗。间接测热法与各公式之间的组内相关性较差(0.09 - 0.20)。我们观察到临床一致性较差(Bland - Altman)。

结论

住院期间体重指数和静息能量消耗增加。大多数预测公式高估了青少年神经性厌食症患者的静息能量消耗。因此,间接测热法可能是计算这些患者热量需求的非常有用的工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验