Suppr超能文献

严重心动过缓的紧急心脏起搏

Emergency cardiac pacing for severe bradycardia.

作者信息

Altamura G, Toscano S, Lo Bianco F, Catalano F, Pistolese M

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, S. Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1990 Dec;13(12 Pt 2):2038-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1990.tb06938.x.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Our study included the treatment of transcutaneous cardiac pacing (TCP) in 32 patients: (A) 19 patients were treated in the emergency area for complete symptomatic AV block before endocavitary pacing; (B) five patients were in asystole following DC shock or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; and (C) eight patients were affected by bifascicular block undergoing emergency surgery and were treated in order to prevent complete AV block. Two transcutaneous stimulators were used. PaceAid-CRC model 50/52 with 20-msec pulse width; the electrodes were positioned on the V3 ECG position and on the back.

RESULTS

in all but two patients, it was possible to obtain stable cardiac capture; in one patient arrived in hospital in asystole after prolonged cardiac arrest and in the other one was affected by complete AV block, TCP was ineffective. In groups A and B, TCP was maintained for a mean time of 15 minutes; in group C, TCP was tested in all patients, but performed in only one patient during surgery. Mean threshold was 81 mA. Stimulation was well tolerated in all but five patients. TCP is a reliable, noninvasive method that offers the possibility to initiate pacing within seconds and can be used by medical staff. In our opinion, it should be considered as the first choice emergency treatment of severe symptomatic bradycardia. In asystole, beneficial effects can be obtained only if TCP is performed early enough after the onset of arrhythmia.

摘要

未标注

我们的研究纳入了32例经皮心脏起搏(TCP)治疗的患者:(A)19例患者在急诊区域接受治疗,用于腔内起搏前的完全症状性房室传导阻滞;(B)5例患者在直流电休克或院外心脏骤停后出现心搏停止;(C)8例患有双分支阻滞的患者接受急诊手术,并接受治疗以预防完全性房室传导阻滞。使用了两台经皮刺激器。PaceAid-CRC 50/52型,脉冲宽度为20毫秒;电极置于V3心电图位置和背部。

结果

除两名患者外,在所有患者中均能获得稳定的心脏捕获;一名患者在长时间心脏骤停后心搏停止入院,另一名患者患有完全性房室传导阻滞,TCP无效。在A组和B组中,TCP平均维持15分钟;在C组中,对所有患者进行了TCP测试,但仅在一名患者的手术过程中进行了操作。平均阈值为81毫安。除五名患者外,所有患者对刺激耐受性良好。TCP是一种可靠的非侵入性方法,能够在数秒内启动起搏,并且医护人员均可使用。我们认为,它应被视为严重症状性心动过缓的首选紧急治疗方法。在心搏停止时,只有在心律失常发作后尽早进行TCP才能获得有益效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验