Kovács P, Csaba G
Department of Genetics, Cell and Immunobiology, Semmelweis University, Nagyvárad tér 4, Budapest, Hungary.
Acta Biol Hung. 2006 Sep;57(3):323-9. doi: 10.1556/ABiol.57.2006.3.6.
Using confocal microscopic analysis, FITC-labelled anti-alpha-tubulin antibody and the fluorescent taxol derivative Flutax-1 in fixed and living Tetrahymena pyriformis GL, longitudinal microtubules, oral and somatic cilia, deep fibers, and contractile vacuole pores were equally labeled. While the antibody stained transversal microtubules, these were not labeled by Flutax-1. At the same time, oral cilia were more intensely stained by Flutax-1, than by the antibody. There were no differences in the staining of fixed preparations and living cells. The observations suggest (i) the difference between the MAPs of longitudinal and transversal microtubules which allow or inhibit the binding of the indicator molecules, and (ii) the different functions of these two types of microtubules.
使用共聚焦显微镜分析,在固定和活的梨形四膜虫GL中,异硫氰酸荧光素标记的抗α-微管蛋白抗体和荧光紫杉醇衍生物Flutax-1对纵向微管、口纤毛和体纤毛、深部纤维以及收缩泡孔进行了同等标记。虽然该抗体可染横向微管,但Flutax-1未对其进行标记。同时,口纤毛被Flutax-1染色的强度高于被该抗体染色的强度。固定制剂和活细胞的染色没有差异。这些观察结果表明:(i)纵向和横向微管的微管相关蛋白(MAPs)之间存在差异,这种差异允许或抑制指示剂分子的结合;(ii)这两种类型微管具有不同的功能。