Berlie Helen D, Kalus James S, Jaber Linda A
Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201-2417, USA.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007 May;76(2):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2006.09.010. Epub 2006 Oct 18.
The use of thiazolidinediones (TZDs) in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been associated with an increased risk of peripheral edema. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the overall risk for developing edema secondary to TZD. A systematic literature search was conducted using five electronic databases. All prospective, randomized, either placebo-controlled or comparative studies reporting the incidence of edema with TZD therapy were included. Odds ratios were generated by pooling estimates across the studies. The analysis included 26 studies consisting of 15,332 patients with T2DM. The pooled odds ratio for TZD induced edema was 2.26 (95% CI: 2.02-2.53). The results yielded a higher risk for developing edema with rosiglitazone (3.75 [2.70-5.20]) compared to pioglitazone (2.42 [1.90-3.08]). Concordant results persisted with calculations of the adjusted indirect estimate. This meta-analysis demonstrates at least a two-fold increase in the risk for developing edema with a TZD agent. The risk appears to be greater with rosiglitazone than with pioglitazone. Further studies are needed to explore this difference.
噻唑烷二酮类药物(TZDs)用于2型糖尿病(T2DM)的治疗时,与外周水肿风险增加相关。进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估继发于TZDs的水肿发生的总体风险。使用五个电子数据库进行了系统的文献检索。纳入所有报告TZDs治疗水肿发生率的前瞻性、随机、安慰剂对照或比较研究。通过汇总各研究的估计值得出比值比。该分析包括26项研究,共15332例T2DM患者。TZDs引起水肿的汇总比值比为2.26(95%CI:2.02 - 2.53)。结果显示,与吡格列酮(2.42 [1.90 - 3.08])相比,罗格列酮(3.75 [2.70 - 5.20])引起水肿的风险更高。调整后的间接估计计算结果一致。这项荟萃分析表明,使用TZDs药物发生水肿的风险至少增加了两倍。罗格列酮的风险似乎比吡格列酮更大。需要进一步研究来探索这种差异。