Khanderia Ujjaini, Pop-Busui Rodica, Eagle Kim A
College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Ann Pharmacother. 2008 Oct;42(10):1466-74. doi: 10.1345/aph.1K666. Epub 2008 Sep 2.
To examine the cardiovascular effects of thiazolidinediones (TZDs), discuss concerns regarding this drug class and its relation to heart failure (HF) and myocardial infarction (MI), and address the clinical implications of HF and MI.
Literature was accessed through MEDLINE (1979-April 2008) using the search terms type 2 diabetes mellitus, thiazolidinediones, cardiovascular events, heart failure, myocardial infarction, and edema. Reviews, meta-analyses, clinical trials, observational studies (case-control, cohort), and descriptive studies (case reports, case series) were included.
All articles that were written in English and identified from the data sources were reviewed.
The American Diabetes Association recommends metformin as first-line therapy for type 2 diabetes, with the subsequent addition of a TZD, sulfonylurea, or insulin if the target is not met. Beyond glucose lowering, TZDs improve various factors associated with cardiovascular risk. Whether the effects translate into beneficial cardiovascular outcomes is controversial. In PROactive (Prospective Pioglitazone Clinical Trial in Macrovascular Events), pioglitazone did not produce a significant reduction in the primary endpoint that included a composite of coronary and vascular deaths, but the secondary composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, MI, or stroke was significantly reduced. Concerns related to HF have led to warnings in the labeling of TZDs. The drugs are contraindicated in patients with New York Heart Association Class III or IV HF. Rosiglitazone, but not pioglitazone, is associated with an increased risk of myocardial ischemic events, although the absolute magnitude is extremely small.
Although the glycemic efficacy of TZDs is comparable to that of metformin, adverse effects and higher costs make TZDs less appealing for initial therapy. Among the TZDs, pioglitazone should be considered based on cardiovascular safety data. In combination with metformin, pioglitazone may be particularly beneficial for patients with diabetes and metabolic syndrome. For patients on rosiglitazone who are achieving glycemic goals and tolerating the therapy without apparent complications, rosiglitazone may be continued.
研究噻唑烷二酮类药物(TZDs)对心血管系统的影响,讨论有关该类药物的问题及其与心力衰竭(HF)和心肌梗死(MI)的关系,并阐述HF和MI的临床意义。
通过MEDLINE(1979年至2008年4月)检索文献,检索词为2型糖尿病、噻唑烷二酮类药物、心血管事件、心力衰竭、心肌梗死和水肿。纳入综述、荟萃分析、临床试验、观察性研究(病例对照、队列研究)和描述性研究(病例报告、病例系列)。
对所有从数据来源中识别出的英文文章进行综述。
美国糖尿病协会推荐二甲双胍作为2型糖尿病的一线治疗药物,如果未达到治疗目标,随后可加用TZDs、磺脲类药物或胰岛素。除了降低血糖外,TZDs还可改善与心血管风险相关的多种因素。这些作用是否能转化为有益的心血管结局仍存在争议。在PROactive(吡格列酮大血管事件前瞻性临床试验)中,吡格列酮并未使包括冠状动脉和血管性死亡在内的主要终点显著降低,但全因死亡率、MI或中风的次要复合终点显著降低。与HF相关的问题已导致在TZDs的药品标签中出现警示。纽约心脏协会III或IV级HF患者禁用此类药物。罗格列酮而非吡格列酮与心肌缺血事件风险增加有关,尽管绝对增加幅度极小。
尽管TZDs的降糖疗效与二甲双胍相当,但不良反应和较高成本使TZDs对初始治疗的吸引力降低。在TZDs中,基于心血管安全性数据应考虑使用吡格列酮。与二甲双胍联合使用时,吡格列酮可能对糖尿病和代谢综合征患者特别有益。对于正在使用罗格列酮且血糖控制良好、能耐受治疗且无明显并发症的患者,可继续使用罗格列酮。