Sellier Elodie, Labarere Jose, Bosson Jean-Luc, Auvray Malika, Barrellier Marie-Therese, Le Hello Claire, Belmin Joel, Le Roux Philippe, Sevestre Marie-Antoinette
Quality of Care Unit, University Hospital, and ThEMAS, TIMC-IMAG, National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS 5525.
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Oct 23;166(19):2065-71. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.19.2065.
Thromboprophylaxis in elderly patients, including post-acute care patients, is at variance with scientific evidence. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a multifaceted intervention was followed by a decrease in deep venous thrombosis (DVT).
A prospective preintervention-postintervention study was conducted in 1373 patients (preintervention phase, n = 709; postintervention phase, n = 664), aged 65 years or older, enrolled in 33 hospital-based post-acute care facilities in France. An evidence-based guideline addressing pharmacologic and mechanical prophylaxis was implemented through a multifaceted intervention. The main outcome measure was any DVT diagnosed at routine comprehensive ultrasonography performed by registered angiologists.
A DVT was found in 91 patients (12.8%) in the preintervention phase and in 52 patients (7.8%) in the postintervention phase (P = .002). The decrease in DVT involved the calf (7.1% vs 3.6%; P = .005) and the proximal venous segments (5.8% vs 4.2%; P = .18) and remained significant after adjusting for risk factors (adjusted odds ratio of any DVT, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-0.86). Pharmacologic prophylaxis with either low-molecular-weight heparin at the high-risk dose, unfractionated heparin, and vitamin K antagonist was similar in the 2 study groups, whereas patients in the postintervention group were more likely to use graduated compression stockings (27.4% vs 34.6%; P = .004) and less likely to receive low-molecular-weight heparin at the low-risk dose (24.7% vs 18.5%; P = .006), which was not recommended by our guideline.
A multifaceted intervention addressing venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in post-acute care patients can be followed by a significant decrease in the rate of any DVT in elderly patients. More active interventions are needed to enforce compliance with evidence-based guidelines.
老年患者(包括急性后期护理患者)的血栓预防措施与科学证据不符。本研究的目的是确定多方面干预措施实施后深静脉血栓形成(DVT)是否减少。
在法国33家医院的急性后期护理机构中,对1373名65岁及以上患者进行了一项前瞻性干预前-干预后研究(干预前期,n = 709;干预后期,n = 664)。通过多方面干预实施了一项关于药物和机械预防的循证指南。主要结局指标是由注册血管造影师进行的常规综合超声检查诊断出的任何DVT。
干预前期91名患者(12.8%)发现DVT,干预后期52名患者(7.8%)发现DVT(P = 0.002)。DVT的减少涉及小腿(7.1%对3.6%;P = 0.005)和近端静脉段(5.8%对4.2%;P = 0.18),在调整风险因素后仍具有显著性(任何DVT的调整优势比为0.58;95%置信区间,0.39 - 0.86)。两个研究组中使用高风险剂量低分子肝素、普通肝素和维生素K拮抗剂进行药物预防的情况相似,而干预后期组患者更有可能使用分级压力袜(27.4%对34.6%;P = 0.004),且接受低风险剂量低分子肝素的可能性较小(24.7%对18.5%;P = 0.006),而这是我们的指南不推荐的。
针对急性后期护理患者静脉血栓栓塞预防的多方面干预措施实施后,老年患者中任何DVT的发生率可显著降低。需要更积极的干预措施来加强对循证指南的依从性。