Ward Robert M, Benitz William E, Benjamin Daniel K, Blackmon Lillian, Giacoia George P, Hudak Mark, Lasky Tamar, Rodriguez William, Selen Arzu
Department of Pediatrics and the Pediatric Pharmacology Program, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84108, USA.
Clin Ther. 2006 Sep;28(9):1385-98. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.09.007.
Profound changes in the development and the maturation of neonates' organs and organ systems over variable periods of time potentially place neonates at increased risk and/or at different risks compared with adults or older children on exposure to pharmaceutical agents. Most studies of drugs in neonates focus on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic end points and include insufficient numbers of patients to permit evaluation of safety. Only one fourth to one third of approved drugs have received adequate pediatric study to permit labeling for treatment of all appropriate pediatric populations.
The initial goal of the Newborn Drug Prioritization Group was to develop a reproducible, objective process for evaluating drugs most in need of study in the neonatal population based on a universally acceptable priority ranking. The criteria would be applicable across therapeutic classes and would identify those drugs for which immediate study was most needed.
Because the therapeutic requirements of the neonate are unique in comparison to older infants and children, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) developed the Newborn Drug Development Initiative to address the limited study of off-patent drugs in newborns. In March 2003, they convened a meeting of pediatric pharmacologists and pediatric specialists from the FDA, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the National Institutes of Health, and academic institutions to discuss how to increase the study of drugs for the newborn. One of the working groups was charged to develop generic criteria for overall prioritization of drugs for study in newborns. Because resources are limited, and not all drugs identified by the 4 clinically focused working groups can receive study at the same time, a process for priority ranking is necessary.
The panel identified 4 general categories containing different numbers of criteria as important for ranking drugs for priority investigation: (1) the disease and indication, including elements such as the potential for adverse outcomes, frequency in newborns, and level of evidence for treatment of newborns; (2) drug characteristics, including elements such as duration of dosing, lack of age-appropriate formulation, clinically relevant drug-drug and drug-disease interactions, and drug disposition in newborns; (3) feasibility and methodology for newborn studies, including both analytical considerations and clinical end points; and (4) the ethical basis for study, including elements to address benefit or harm due to exposure to the study drug, study methodology, and benefit of the new treatment relative to established standard therapy. Based on these categories, a list of criteria to warrant study of a drug in newborns was developed.
A process for judicious use of limited resources to rectify these deficiencies remains an urgent public health need.
新生儿器官和器官系统在不同时间段内的发育和成熟会发生深刻变化,这可能使新生儿在接触药物制剂时比成年人或大龄儿童面临更高的风险和/或不同的风险。大多数关于新生儿药物的研究都集中在药代动力学和药效学终点上,且纳入的患者数量不足以评估安全性。只有四分之一到三分之一的获批药物进行了充分的儿科研究,以允许标注用于治疗所有合适的儿科人群。
新生儿药物优先排序小组的最初目标是基于普遍认可的优先级排序,制定一个可重复、客观的流程,用于评估新生儿群体中最需要研究的药物。该标准应适用于所有治疗类别,并确定那些最需要立即开展研究的药物。
由于与大龄婴儿和儿童相比,新生儿的治疗需求具有独特性,美国国立儿童健康与人类发展研究所和美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)发起了新生儿药物开发倡议,以解决新生儿中专利过期药物研究有限的问题。2003年3月,他们召集了来自FDA、美国儿科学会、国立卫生研究院和学术机构的儿科药理学家和儿科专家会议,讨论如何增加新生儿药物研究。其中一个工作组负责制定新生儿药物研究总体优先级的通用标准。由于资源有限,且4个临床重点工作组确定的所有药物不可能同时进行研究,因此需要一个优先级排序流程。
该小组确定了4个包含不同数量标准的一般类别,这些类别对药物优先研究的排序很重要:(1)疾病和适应症,包括不良后果的可能性、在新生儿中的发生率以及新生儿治疗的证据水平等要素;(2)药物特性,包括给药持续时间、缺乏适合年龄的剂型、临床相关的药物相互作用和药物疾病相互作用以及新生儿中的药物处置等要素;(3)新生儿研究的可行性和方法,包括分析考量和临床终点;(4)研究的伦理基础,包括因接触研究药物导致的益处或危害、研究方法以及新治疗相对于既定标准治疗的益处等要素。基于这些类别,制定了一份保证对新生儿药物进行研究的标准清单。
明智利用有限资源来纠正这些不足的流程仍然是一项紧迫的公共卫生需求。