Suppr超能文献

[腹壁子宫内膜异位症切除术后腹壁缺损的修复]

[Repair of abdominal wall defect after resection of abdominal wall endometriosis].

作者信息

Cheng Ning-hai, Zhu Lan, Lang Jing-he, Liu Zhu-feng, Sun Da-wei, Leng Jin-hua, Shen Keng, Huang Hui-fang, Pan Ling-ya, Wu Ming

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2006 Jul 18;86(27):1919-21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the techniques to repair the fascia layer of abdominal wall after the resection of abdominal wall endometriosis (AWE).

METHODS

Fifty-five AWE patients aged 28 approximately 38 underwent resection of the lesion. After the resection a defect fascia in abdominal wall larger than 2 cm(2) was seen in 29 patients (large fascia defect group), and in the other 26 patients the fascia defect was less than 2 cm(2) (small fascia defect group). In the large fascia defect group, 11 cases underwent routine closure of the abdominal wall, 2 underwent abdominal wall reconstruction by applying tension suture, 1 case underwent fascia layer/skin tension-relieving suture, 4 cases abdominal wall reconstruction by PDS-II suture, 4 cases underwent fascia patch grafting, and 7 cases underwent abdominal wall plastic repair plus fascia patch grafting, the different techniques being selected according to the size of the defect. Routine abdominal wall closure was performed on all the 26 patients in the small fascia detect group. The features of the lesion and operation, and the outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Primary healing was achieved in all the patients. In comparison with the small fascia defect group, the mean size of the masses measured by pre-operational ultrasonography of the large fascia defect group was significantly bigger [(3.8 +/- 1.4) cm vs. (2.5 +/- 1.1 cm)], the mean size of the masses resected in operation was significantly larger [(5, 5 +/- 2.0) cm vs. (3.7 +/- 1.9) cm, P = 0.004], the operation time was significantly longer [(66 +/- 42) min vs. (35 +/- 24) min, P = 0.002], and the intra-operational blood loss was significantly more [(52 +/- 50) ml vs. (23 +/- 19) ml, P = 0.006]. Relapse occurred in 1 case in the large fascia defect group.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasonography helps estimate the extension of AWE before operation. Fascia layer/skin tension-relieving suture can be used in the fascia defect of abdominal wall larger than 2 cm(2). Abdominal wall plastic repair plus fascia patch grafting is capable of repairing larger fascia layer and skin defects of abdominal wall.

摘要

目的

研究腹壁子宫内膜异位症(AWE)切除术后腹壁筋膜层的修复技术。

方法

55例年龄在28至38岁的AWE患者接受了病灶切除术。切除术后,29例患者腹壁出现大于2 cm²的筋膜缺损(大筋膜缺损组),另外26例患者筋膜缺损小于2 cm²(小筋膜缺损组)。在大筋膜缺损组中,11例行腹壁常规缝合,2例行张力缝合腹壁重建术,1例行筋膜层/皮肤减张缝合,4例行PDS-II缝线腹壁重建术,4例行筋膜补片移植术,7例行腹壁整形修复加筋膜补片移植术,根据缺损大小选择不同技术。小筋膜缺损组的26例患者均行腹壁常规缝合。比较病变及手术特点和结局。

结果

所有患者均实现一期愈合。与小筋膜缺损组相比,大筋膜缺损组术前超声测量肿块的平均大小显著更大[(3.8±1.4)cm对(2.5±1.1)cm],手术切除肿块的平均大小显著更大[(5.5±2.0)cm对(3.7±1.9)cm,P = 0.004],手术时间显著更长[(66±42)分钟对(35±24)分钟,P = 0.002],术中失血量显著更多[(52±50)ml对(23±19)ml,P = 0.006]。大筋膜缺损组有1例复发。

结论

超声有助于术前评估AWE的范围。筋膜层/皮肤减张缝合可用于大于2 cm²的腹壁筋膜缺损。腹壁整形修复加筋膜补片移植能够修复较大的腹壁筋膜层和皮肤缺损。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验