Beauregard L A, Volosin K J, Waxman H L
Division of Cardiology, UMDNJ/Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Camden Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center 08103.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991 Feb;14(2 Pt 1):161-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1991.tb05085.x.
Antitachycardia devices currently use sustained high rate, abrupt changes in cycle length, and probability density function to determine the onset of ventricular tachycardia. Hemodynamic changes occur with the onset of tachycardia and may provide a method of discriminating supraventricular from ventricular tachycardia. In this study, patients had atrial and ventricular pressures measured during rapid atrial and ventricular pacing. Right atrial pressure increased significantly with ventricular pacing but not with atrial pacing. Right ventricular pressures did not significantly differ with atrial or ventricular pacing. The change in atrial pressure compared to baseline was greater, with ventricular pacing compared to atrial pacing. Right ventricular pressure increased compared to baseline with atrial or ventricular pacing, but there was no significant difference between pacing modalities. Measurement of right atrial pressure might prove useful in discriminating supraventricular from ventricular tachycardia.
目前,抗心动过速装置利用持续高心率、周期长度的突然变化以及概率密度函数来确定室性心动过速的发作。心动过速发作时会出现血流动力学变化,这可能提供一种区分室上性心动过速和室性心动过速的方法。在本研究中,对患者在快速心房和心室起搏期间测量心房和心室压力。心室起搏时右心房压力显著升高,而心房起搏时则不然。右心室压力在心房或心室起搏时无显著差异。与心房起搏相比,心室起搏时心房压力相对于基线的变化更大。心房或心室起搏时右心室压力相对于基线均升高,但起搏方式之间无显著差异。测量右心房压力可能有助于区分室上性心动过速和室性心动过速。