Polónia Jorge, Carvalho Nuno, Barbosa Loide, Silva José A
Unidade de Hipertensão e Risco Cardiovascular, Hospital Pedro Hispano, Matosinhos, Portugal Faculdade de Medicina do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Rev Port Cardiol. 2006 Jul-Aug;25(7-8):693-704.
It is still controversial whether subjects with white-coat hypertension (WCHT) exhibit higher cardiovascular risk compared to normotensive subjects (NT). In subjects with WCHT it is not known whether the abnormal blood pressure (BP) reaction in the office also occurs at other times of day, particularly on arising and immediately after waking, i.e. the times at which the majority of cardiovascular events are reported to occur.
To evaluate with 24h ambulatory BP measurement the values of morning BP surge, BP on arising and BP variability in subjects with WCHT in comparison with age-, gender- and weight-matched normotensives (BP) and untreated sustained hypertensives (BP).
Groups of BP, WCHT and BP were matched for age, gender and body weight: BP: n=69, age 49 +/- 7 years, 54 % female, BMI 26 +/- 1, casual BP 126/79 +/- 5/4 mmHg, daytime BP 124/80 +/- 6/6 mmHg; WCHT: n=74, age 52 +/- 8 years, 57% female, BMI 26 +/- 2, casual BP 152/95 +/- 7/7 mmHg, daytime BP 126/80 +/- 5/6 mmHg; HT: n=79, age 53 +/- 7 years, 56% female, BMI 27 +/- 2, casual BP 154/97 +/- 9/8 mmHg, daytime BP 143/89 +/- 12/10 mmHg. Of the three groups, subjects with WCHT exhibited BP on arising (121/81 +/- 13/8 mmHg) similar to that of NTs (120/80 +/- 13/9 mmHg, NS), both significantly lower than that of HTs (137/92 +/- 17/10 mmHg, p < 0.01), suggesting the absence of an alerting BP reaction in WCHT at that time. By contrast, subjects with WCHT showed higher values of systolic morning BP surge vs. NTs (25 +/- 10 vs. 22 +/- 11 mmHg, p < 0.05), both lower than that observed in hypertensives (33 +/- 11 mmHg, p < 0.01 vs. NT and WCHT) and greater daytime variability (systolic BP standard variation), i.e. 12 2 vs. 10 +/- 2 mmHg, p < 0.05, both lower than that observed in hypertensives (14 +/- 3 mmHg, p < 0.01 vs. NT and WCHT).
Although subjects with WCHT did not show any alerting blood pressure reaction on arising, morning BP surge and BP variability were greater in these subjects than in control normotensives, although lower than sustained hypertensives. Although this is still speculative, we cannot exclude the possibility that even a slight increase in morning BP surge might in the long term constitute an additional load on the circulation that could increase cardiovascular risk in subjects with WCHT compared to matched normotensives.
与血压正常的受试者(NT)相比,白大衣高血压(WCHT)患者是否具有更高的心血管疾病风险仍存在争议。对于WCHT患者,尚不清楚诊室中异常的血压(BP)反应在一天中的其他时间是否也会出现,尤其是在起床时和刚醒来后,即据报道大多数心血管事件发生的时间段。
通过24小时动态血压测量,评估WCHT患者与年龄、性别和体重匹配的血压正常者(NT)以及未经治疗的持续性高血压患者(HT)相比的清晨血压骤升值、起床时血压和血压变异性。
NT组、WCHT组和HT组在年龄、性别和体重方面相匹配:NT组:n = 69,年龄49±7岁,女性占54%,体重指数(BMI)26±1,偶测血压126/79±5/4 mmHg,日间血压124/80±6/6 mmHg;WCHT组:n = 74,年龄52±8岁,女性占57%,BMI 26±2,偶测血压152/95±7/7 mmHg,日间血压126/80±5/6 mmHg;HT组:n = 79,年龄53±7岁,女性占56%,BMI 27±2,偶测血压154/97±9/8 mmHg,日间血压143/89±12/10 mmHg。在这三组中,WCHT患者起床时的血压(121/81±13/8 mmHg)与NT患者(120/80±13/9 mmHg,无显著性差异)相似,均显著低于HT患者(137/92±17/10 mmHg,p<0.01),这表明WCHT患者在起床时不存在警觉性血压反应。相比之下,WCHT患者的清晨收缩压骤升值高于NT患者(25±10与22±11 mmHg,p<0.05),两者均低于高血压患者(33±11 mmHg,与NT和WCHT相比p<0.01),且日间变异性更大(收缩压标准差),即12±2与10±2 mmHg,p<0.05,两者均低于高血压患者(14±3 mmHg,与NT和WCHT相比p<0.01)。
尽管WCHT患者在起床时未表现出任何警觉性血压反应,但其清晨血压骤升和血压变异性高于对照组血压正常者,尽管低于持续性高血压患者。虽然这仍属推测,但我们不能排除这样一种可能性,即从长远来看,即使清晨血压骤升略有增加,相较于匹配的血压正常者,也可能会给WCHT患者的循环系统带来额外负担,从而增加心血管疾病风险。