Suppr超能文献

多学科团队会议提高了食管癌的分期准确性和治疗选择。

The multidisciplinary team meeting improves staging accuracy and treatment selection for gastro-esophageal cancer.

作者信息

Davies A R, Deans D A C, Penman I, Plevris J N, Fletcher J, Wall L, Phillips H, Gilmour H, Patel D, de Beaux A, Paterson-Brown S

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Lothian Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Group, Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Dis Esophagus. 2006;19(6):496-503. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2006.00629.x.

Abstract

The object of this article is to assess current staging accuracies for individual modalities and to investigate the influence of the multidisciplinary team (MDT) on clinical staging accuracies and treatment selection for patients with gastro-esophageal cancer. Patients newly diagnosed with gastric or esophageal cancer and who were deemed suitable for surgical resection by the MDT were studied. Patients were staged with a combination of computerized tomography (CT), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and laparoscopic ultrasound (LUS). Additionally, the MDT determined an overall clinical stage for each patient after discussion at the MDT meeting. Treatments were selected according to this final clinical stage. Final histopathological staging (pTNM) was available for all patients and was used as the gold standard for determining staging accuracy. Suitability of treatment selection was assessed once final pTNM was available. One hundred and eighteen patients were studied. Endoscopic ultrasound was the most accurate individual staging modality for the loco-regional assessment of esophageal tumors (T stage accuracy 78%, N stage accuracy 70%). Laparoscopic ultrasound was the most accurate modality in T staging of gastric cancers (91%). The MDT stage was more accurate than each individual staging modality for T and N staging for both gastric and esophageal cancers (accuracy range: 88-89%) and was better for the assessment of nodal disease than each individual modality (CT P < 0.001, EUS P < 0.01, LUS P < 0.01). Overall staging accuracy as determined at the MDT meeting was increased and resulted in only 2/118 (2%) patients being under-treated. The MDT significantly improves staging accuracy for gastro-esophageal cancer and ensures that correct management decisions are made for the highest number of individual patients.

摘要

本文的目的是评估当前各单项检查手段的分期准确性,并研究多学科团队(MDT)对胃癌和食管癌患者临床分期准确性及治疗选择的影响。研究对象为新诊断为胃癌或食管癌且被MDT认为适合手术切除的患者。患者通过计算机断层扫描(CT)、内镜超声(EUS)和腹腔镜超声(LUS)联合进行分期。此外,MDT在MDT会议讨论后为每位患者确定总体临床分期。根据这一最终临床分期选择治疗方案。所有患者均有最终的组织病理学分期(pTNM),并将其用作确定分期准确性的金标准。在获得最终pTNM后评估治疗选择的适宜性。共研究了118例患者。内镜超声是食管肿瘤局部区域评估中最准确的单项分期检查手段(T分期准确率78%,N分期准确率70%)。腹腔镜超声在胃癌T分期中最准确(91%)。对于胃癌和食管癌的T分期和N分期,MDT分期比各单项分期检查手段更准确(准确率范围:88 - 89%),并且在评估淋巴结疾病方面比各单项检查手段更好(CT P < 0.001,EUS P < 0.01,LUS P < 0.01)。MDT会议确定的总体分期准确性提高,仅2/118(2%)的患者接受了不充分治疗。MDT显著提高了胃癌和食管癌的分期准确性,并确保为最多数量的个体患者做出正确的管理决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验