• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多学科团队会议可提高食管癌患者的生存率。

Multidisciplinary team meetings improve survival in patients with esophageal cancer.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Dis Esophagus. 2024 Oct 28;37(11). doi: 10.1093/dote/doae061.

DOI:10.1093/dote/doae061
PMID:39119871
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11518921/
Abstract

Multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTs) are recommended for patients with esophageal cancer. Improved staging, timeliness to surgery and better adherence to guidelines have been attributed to MDTs, but there are few studies published on the MDTs' effect on survival. All patients with esophageal cancer in Sweden between 2006 and 2018 were grouped according to whether they had been discussed at an MDT as part of their clinical pathway. Factors affecting group allocation were explored with multivariable logistic regression, and the impact of MDT on survival was studied with Cox-regression and the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Of 6837 included patients, 1338 patients (20%) were not discussed at an MDT. Advanced age (80-90 years; odds ratio [OR] 0.25, 0.16-0.42 (95% confidence interval)) and clinical stage IVb (OR 0.65, 0.43-0.98) decreased the probability of being presented at an MDT, whereas high education level (OR 1.31, 1.02-1.67), being married (OR 1.20, 1.01-1.43), squamous histology (OR 1.50, 1.22-1.84) and later year of diagnosis (OR 1.33, 1.29-1.37 per year) increased the probability of an MDT. In multivariable adjusted analysis, MDT discussion was associated with improved survival (hazard ratios 0.72, 0.66-0.78) and median survival increased from 4.5 to 10.7 months. MDTs were associated with improved survival for esophageal cancer patients. Elderly patients with advanced disease and poor socioeconomic status were less likely to be presented at an MDT, but had clear survival-benefits if they were discussed in a multidisciplinary setting.

摘要

多学科团队会议(MDTs)推荐用于治疗食管癌患者。MDTs 可改善分期、手术及时性和更好地遵循指南,但发表的关于 MDT 对生存影响的研究较少。2006 年至 2018 年间,所有在瑞典的食管癌患者均根据其是否在临床路径中进行 MDT 讨论进行分组。采用多变量逻辑回归探讨影响分组的因素,并采用 Cox 回归和 Kaplan-Meier 估计器研究 MDT 对生存的影响。在纳入的 6837 例患者中,有 1338 例(20%)未在 MDT 中讨论。高龄(80-90 岁;比值比 [OR] 0.25,0.16-0.42(95%置信区间))和临床 IVb 期(OR 0.65,0.43-0.98)降低了在 MDT 中出现的可能性,而高教育水平(OR 1.31,1.02-1.67)、已婚(OR 1.20,1.01-1.43)、鳞状组织学(OR 1.50,1.22-1.84)和较晚的诊断年份(OR 1.33,每年 1.29-1.37)增加了 MDT 的可能性。在多变量调整分析中,MDT 讨论与改善生存相关(风险比 0.72,0.66-0.78),中位生存时间从 4.5 个月增加到 10.7 个月。MDTs 与食管癌患者的生存改善相关。患有晚期疾病和较差社会经济地位的老年患者不太可能在 MDT 中出现,但如果在多学科环境中进行讨论,则具有明显的生存获益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25fe/11518921/f5ed0a11a8bd/doae061f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25fe/11518921/c0e0b9fddb94/doae061f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25fe/11518921/f5ed0a11a8bd/doae061f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25fe/11518921/c0e0b9fddb94/doae061f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25fe/11518921/f5ed0a11a8bd/doae061f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Multidisciplinary team meetings improve survival in patients with esophageal cancer.多学科团队会议可提高食管癌患者的生存率。
Dis Esophagus. 2024 Oct 28;37(11). doi: 10.1093/dote/doae061.
2
Preoperative multidisciplinary team assessment is associated with improved survival in patients with locally advanced colon cancer; a nationwide cohort study in 3157 patients.术前多学科团队评估与局部晚期结肠癌患者的生存改善相关;3157 例患者的全国性队列研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep;47(9):2398-2404. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.008. Epub 2021 May 14.
3
Impact of multidisciplinary tumor board discussion on palliation of patients with esophageal or gastro-esophageal junction cancer: a population-based study.多学科肿瘤委员会讨论对食管或胃食管交界处癌症患者缓解症状的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
Acta Oncol. 2020 Apr;59(4):410-416. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2020.1725240. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
4
Do Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) processes influence survival in patients with colorectal cancer? A population-based experience.多学科团队(MDT)流程是否会影响结直肠癌患者的生存率?一项基于人群的经验。
BMC Cancer. 2015 Oct 13;15:686. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1683-1.
5
Improving patient survival with the colorectal cancer multi-disciplinary team.通过结直肠癌多学科团队提高患者生存率。
Colorectal Dis. 2009 Mar;11(3):291-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01580.x. Epub 2008 May 9.
6
Effect of multidisciplinary team care on survival of oesophageal cancer patients: a retrospective nationwide cohort study.多学科团队护理对食管癌患者生存的影响:一项回顾性全国队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 24;11(1):13243. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92618-w.
7
Patient education-level affects treatment allocation and prognosis in esophageal- and gastroesophageal junctional cancer in Sweden.在瑞典,患者的教育水平会影响食管癌和胃食管交界癌的治疗分配及预后。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2018 Feb;52:91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2017.12.008. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
8
Treatment utilization and outcomes in elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma: a review of the National Cancer Database.老年局部晚期食管癌患者的治疗利用情况及结局:美国国立癌症数据库综述
Cancer Med. 2017 Dec;6(12):2886-2896. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1250. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
9
Does presentation at multidisciplinary team meetings improve lung cancer survival? Findings from a consecutive cohort study.多学科团队会议展示是否能改善肺癌患者的生存率?一项连续队列研究的结果。
Lung Cancer. 2018 Oct;124:199-204. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.07.032. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
10
Is there a Benefit of Multidisciplinary Cancer Team Meetings for Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies?多学科癌症团队会议对胃肠道恶性肿瘤患者有益吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Aug;23(8):2430-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5178-3. Epub 2016 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Preoperative radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a narrative review.局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌患者的术前放疗:一项叙述性综述
Front Oncol. 2025 Jul 22;15:1613954. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1613954. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of multidisciplinary team care on survival of oesophageal cancer patients: a retrospective nationwide cohort study.多学科团队护理对食管癌患者生存的影响:一项回顾性全国队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 24;11(1):13243. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92618-w.
2
Early intervention of the perioperative multidisciplinary team approach decreases the adverse events during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer patients.围手术期多学科团队早期干预可降低食管癌新辅助化疗期间的不良事件。
Esophagus. 2021 Oct;18(4):797-805. doi: 10.1007/s10388-021-00844-y. Epub 2021 May 17.
3
Implementation of a regional video multidisciplinary team meeting is associated with an improved prognosis for patients with oesophageal cancer A mixed methods approach.
实施区域性视频多学科团队会议与改善食管癌患者预后相关:一项混合方法研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;47(12):3088-3096. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.04.020. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
4
Role of a multidisciplinary team in administering radiotherapy for esophageal cancer.多学科团队在食管癌放射治疗中的作用。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Oct 8;20(1):974. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07467-z.
5
Effect of multidisciplinary team care on the risk of recurrence in breast cancer patients: A national matched cohort study.多学科团队护理对乳腺癌患者复发风险的影响:一项全国匹配队列研究。
Breast. 2020 Oct;53:68-76. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.07.001. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
6
Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4): a randomised, phase 2/3 trial.氟尿嘧啶+亚叶酸、奥沙利铂和多西紫杉醇与氟尿嘧啶或卡培他滨+顺铂和表柔比星用于局部晚期可切除胃或胃食管交界处腺癌的围手术期化疗(FLOT4):一项随机、2/3 期试验。
Lancet. 2019 May 11;393(10184):1948-1957. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32557-1. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
7
Patient education-level affects treatment allocation and prognosis in esophageal- and gastroesophageal junctional cancer in Sweden.在瑞典,患者的教育水平会影响食管癌和胃食管交界癌的治疗分配及预后。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2018 Feb;52:91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2017.12.008. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
8
The Swedish cause of death register.瑞典死亡原因登记册。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2017 Sep;32(9):765-773. doi: 10.1007/s10654-017-0316-1. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
9
Validation of data quality in the Swedish National Register for Oesophageal and Gastric Cancer.瑞典食管和胃癌国家登记处数据质量的验证。
Br J Surg. 2016 Sep;103(10):1326-35. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10234. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
10
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial.新辅助放化疗联合手术与单纯手术治疗食管或食管胃交界癌(CROSS):一项随机对照临床试验的长期结果。
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Sep;16(9):1090-1098. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00040-6. Epub 2015 Aug 5.