Bouman Catherine S C, de Pont Anne-Cornélie J M, Meijers Joost C M, Bakhtiari Kamran, Roem Dorina, Zeerleder Sacha, Wolbink Gertjan, Korevaar Johanna C, Levi Marcel, de Jonge Evert
Department of Intensive Care, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Crit Care. 2006;10(5):R150. doi: 10.1186/cc5080.
The mechanism of coagulation activation during continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) has not yet been elucidated. Insight into the mechanism(s) of hemostatic activation within the extracorporeal circuit could result in a more rational approach to anticoagulation. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether CVVH using cellulose triacetate filters causes activation of the contact factor pathway or of the tissue factor pathway of coagulation. In contrast to previous studies, CVVH was performed without anticoagulation.
Ten critically ill patients were studied prior to the start of CVVH and at 5, 15 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3 and 6 hours thereafter, for measurement of prothrombin fragment F1+2, soluble tissue factor, activated factor VII, tissue factor pathway inhibitor, kallikrein-C1-inhibitor and activated factor XII-C1-inhibitor complexes, tissue-type plasminogen activator, plasminogen activator inhibitor type I, plasmin-antiplasmin complexes, protein C and antithrombin.
During the study period the prothrombin fragment F1+2 levels increased significantly in four patients (defined as group A) and did not change in six patients (defined as group B). Group A also showed a rapid increase in transmembrane pressure, indicating clotting within the filter. At baseline, the activated partial thromboplastin time, the prothrombin time and the kallikrein-C1-inhibitor complex and activated factor XII-C1-inhibitor complex levels were significantly higher in group B, whereas the platelet count was significantly lower in group B. For the other studied markers the differences between group A and group B at baseline were not statistically significant. During CVVH the difference in the time course between group A and group B was not statistically significant for the markers of the tissue factor system (soluble tissue factor, activated factor VII and tissue factor pathway inhibitor), for the markers of the contact system (kallikrein-C1-inhibitor and activated factor XII-C1-inhibitor complexes) and for the markers of the fibrinolytic system (plasmin-antiplasmin complexes, tissue-type plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor type I).
Early thrombin generation was detected in a minority of intensive care patients receiving CVVH without anticoagulation. Systemic concentrations of markers of the tissue factor system and of the contact system did not change during CVVH. To elucidate the mechanism of clot formation during CVVH we suggest that future studies are needed that investigate the activation of coagulation directly at the site of the filter. Early coagulation during CVVH may be related to lower baseline levels of markers of contact activation.
持续静脉-静脉血液滤过(CVVH)期间凝血激活的机制尚未阐明。深入了解体外循环中止血激活的机制可能会产生更合理的抗凝方法。本研究的目的是调查使用三醋酸纤维素滤器的CVVH是否会导致凝血接触因子途径或组织因子途径的激活。与以往研究不同,本研究在无抗凝的情况下进行CVVH。
对10例危重症患者在开始CVVH前以及之后的5、15和30分钟以及1、2、3和6小时进行研究,以测定凝血酶原片段F1+2、可溶性组织因子、活化因子VII、组织因子途径抑制剂、激肽释放酶-C1-抑制剂和活化因子XII-C1-抑制剂复合物、组织型纤溶酶原激活剂、I型纤溶酶原激活剂抑制剂、纤溶酶-抗纤溶酶复合物、蛋白C和抗凝血酶。
在研究期间,4例患者(定义为A组)的凝血酶原片段F1+2水平显著升高,6例患者(定义为B组)未发生变化。A组还显示跨膜压迅速升高,表明滤器内发生凝血。基线时,B组的活化部分凝血活酶时间、凝血酶原时间以及激肽释放酶-C1-抑制剂复合物和活化因子XII-C1-抑制剂复合物水平显著更高,而B组的血小板计数显著更低。对于其他研究的标志物,A组和B组在基线时的差异无统计学意义。在CVVH期间,A组和B组在组织因子系统标志物(可溶性组织因子、活化因子VII和组织因子途径抑制剂)、接触系统标志物(激肽释放酶-C1-抑制剂和活化因子XII-C1-抑制剂复合物)以及纤溶系统标志物(纤溶酶-抗纤溶酶复合物、组织型纤溶酶原激活剂和I型纤溶酶原激活剂抑制剂)的时间进程差异无统计学意义。
在少数接受无抗凝CVVH的重症监护患者中检测到早期凝血酶生成。CVVH期间组织因子系统和接触系统标志物的全身浓度未发生变化。为阐明CVVH期间血栓形成的机制,我们建议未来的研究应直接在滤器部位研究凝血激活情况。CVVH期间的早期凝血可能与接触激活标志物的较低基线水平有关。