Im Hyunjae, Jeong Jaehoon, Oh Seung-Young, Lim Leerang, Lee Hannah, Ryu Ho Geol
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University College of Medicine, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Artif Organs. 2025 Jan;49(1):21-30. doi: 10.1111/aor.14872. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
Renal replacement therapy (RRT) may affect coagulation and platelet function in critically ill patients. However, the mechanism and the difference in the impact on coagulation between intermittent hemodialysis (iHD) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate and compare the impact of iHD and CRRT on coagulation and platelet function.
Critically ill patients undergoing RRT were classified into the iHD group or the CRRT group. After the first blood sampling, patients underwent either a single session of hemodialysis or 48 h of CRRT, then a second blood sample was taken. Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), platelet aggregometry and conventional coagulation tests were performed. The primary outcome was a change in extrinsically activated ROTEM (EXTEM) clotting time (CT).
60 dialysis sessions from 56 patients were finally included, with 30 dialysis sessions per group. EXTEM CT was prolonged significantly after dialysis in the iHD group (90 [74, 128] vs. 74 [61, 91], p < 0.001), but did not change in the CRRT group (94.4 ± 29.4 vs. 91.6 ± 22.9, p = 0.986). The platelet aggregation did not change after both iHD and CRRT. A change in EXTEM CT was significantly greater in the iHD group compared to the CRRT group (p = 0.006). The difference in the incidence of bleeding events was insignificant between the two groups (p = 0.301).
EXTEM CT was significantly prolonged after iHD, but this change was not shown after CRRT. Platelet function was not affected by both dialysis modalities.
肾脏替代治疗(RRT)可能会影响重症患者的凝血和血小板功能。然而,间歇性血液透析(iHD)和连续性肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)对凝血影响的机制及差异仍不清楚。本研究旨在调查和比较iHD和CRRT对凝血及血小板功能的影响。
接受RRT的重症患者被分为iHD组或CRRT组。首次采血后,患者接受单次血液透析或48小时的CRRT,然后采集第二次血样。进行旋转血栓弹力图(ROTEM)、血小板聚集试验和传统凝血试验。主要结局是外源性激活的ROTEM(EXTEM)凝血时间(CT)的变化。
最终纳入了56例患者的60次透析治疗,每组30次透析治疗。iHD组透析后EXTEM CT显著延长(90[74,128]对74[61,91],p<0.001),而CRRT组未改变(94.4±29.4对91.6±22.9,p=0.986)。iHD和CRRT后血小板聚集均未改变。iHD组EXTEM CT的变化显著大于CRRT组(p=0.006)。两组出血事件发生率的差异无统计学意义(p=0.301)。
iHD后EXTEM CT显著延长,但CRRT后未出现此变化。两种透析方式均未影响血小板功能。