Suppr超能文献

肾脏替代治疗方式对危重症患者凝血及血小板功能的影响:一项前瞻性观察性研究。

Impact of renal replacement therapy modality on coagulation and platelet function in critically ill patients: A prospective observational study.

作者信息

Im Hyunjae, Jeong Jaehoon, Oh Seung-Young, Lim Leerang, Lee Hannah, Ryu Ho Geol

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University College of Medicine, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Artif Organs. 2025 Jan;49(1):21-30. doi: 10.1111/aor.14872. Epub 2024 Sep 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Renal replacement therapy (RRT) may affect coagulation and platelet function in critically ill patients. However, the mechanism and the difference in the impact on coagulation between intermittent hemodialysis (iHD) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate and compare the impact of iHD and CRRT on coagulation and platelet function.

METHODS

Critically ill patients undergoing RRT were classified into the iHD group or the CRRT group. After the first blood sampling, patients underwent either a single session of hemodialysis or 48 h of CRRT, then a second blood sample was taken. Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), platelet aggregometry and conventional coagulation tests were performed. The primary outcome was a change in extrinsically activated ROTEM (EXTEM) clotting time (CT).

RESULTS

60 dialysis sessions from 56 patients were finally included, with 30 dialysis sessions per group. EXTEM CT was prolonged significantly after dialysis in the iHD group (90 [74, 128] vs. 74 [61, 91], p < 0.001), but did not change in the CRRT group (94.4 ± 29.4 vs. 91.6 ± 22.9, p = 0.986). The platelet aggregation did not change after both iHD and CRRT. A change in EXTEM CT was significantly greater in the iHD group compared to the CRRT group (p = 0.006). The difference in the incidence of bleeding events was insignificant between the two groups (p = 0.301).

CONCLUSIONS

EXTEM CT was significantly prolonged after iHD, but this change was not shown after CRRT. Platelet function was not affected by both dialysis modalities.

摘要

背景

肾脏替代治疗(RRT)可能会影响重症患者的凝血和血小板功能。然而,间歇性血液透析(iHD)和连续性肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)对凝血影响的机制及差异仍不清楚。本研究旨在调查和比较iHD和CRRT对凝血及血小板功能的影响。

方法

接受RRT的重症患者被分为iHD组或CRRT组。首次采血后,患者接受单次血液透析或48小时的CRRT,然后采集第二次血样。进行旋转血栓弹力图(ROTEM)、血小板聚集试验和传统凝血试验。主要结局是外源性激活的ROTEM(EXTEM)凝血时间(CT)的变化。

结果

最终纳入了56例患者的60次透析治疗,每组30次透析治疗。iHD组透析后EXTEM CT显著延长(90[74,128]对74[61,91],p<0.001),而CRRT组未改变(94.4±29.4对91.6±22.9,p=0.986)。iHD和CRRT后血小板聚集均未改变。iHD组EXTEM CT的变化显著大于CRRT组(p=0.006)。两组出血事件发生率的差异无统计学意义(p=0.301)。

结论

iHD后EXTEM CT显著延长,但CRRT后未出现此变化。两种透析方式均未影响血小板功能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dc11/11687214/16bc736c55f9/AOR-49-21-g003.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验