• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)对癌症患者友好吗?

Has NICE been nice to cancer?

作者信息

Summerhayes Maxwell, Catchpole Paul

机构信息

Medical Department, Roche Products, Hexagon Place, 6 Falcon Way, Shire Park, Welwyn Garden City AL7 1TW, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2006 Nov;42(17):2881-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.08.013. Epub 2006 Oct 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2006.08.013
PMID:17070032
Abstract

This article reviews the work of England's National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the area of cancer treatment since it was established in 1999. NICE provides guidance to the National Health Service (NHS) in England and Wales on the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of therapeutic interventions and aims to support uniform and evidence-based care. Its most high profile work involves making judgements on whether new drug treatments should be available to NHS patients. Over 20 appraisals of anticancer drugs have now been completed by NICE; most have endorsed the availability of the reviewed agent, which is good news for cancer patients. Unfortunately, positive guidance does not, necessarily, eradicate inequalities of access. There are also concerns relating to access to drugs during the period when NICE guidance is being developed and for patients requiring treatments--often for less common cancers--which are not referred to NICE for appraisal.

摘要

本文回顾了英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)自1999年成立以来在癌症治疗领域的工作。NICE就治疗干预措施的临床和成本效益向英格兰和威尔士的国民医疗服务体系(NHS)提供指导,旨在支持统一且基于证据的医疗服务。其最受瞩目的工作包括判断NHS患者是否应能使用新药治疗。NICE现已完成了20多项抗癌药物评估;大多数评估都认可了所审查药物的可用性,这对癌症患者来说是个好消息。不幸的是,积极的指导并不一定能消除获取药物方面的不平等现象。在NICE制定指导期间以及对于需要治疗(通常是针对不太常见癌症)但未提交给NICE进行评估的患者而言,药物获取方面也存在问题。

相似文献

1
Has NICE been nice to cancer?英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)对癌症患者友好吗?
Eur J Cancer. 2006 Nov;42(17):2881-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.08.013. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
2
Working with NICE.与英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所合作。
J Fam Health Care. 2007;17(4):113-4.
3
The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence and its role in assessing the value of new cancer treatments in England and Wales.国家卫生与临床优化研究所及其在评估英格兰和威尔士新癌症疗法价值方面的作用。
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Aug 1;17(15):4930-5. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2510. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
4
Effects of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence's technology appraisals on prescribing and net ingredient costs of drugs in the National Health Service in England.英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所的技术评估对英格兰国民医疗服务体系中药物处方及净成分成本的影响。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Jul;25(3):262-71. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309990110.
5
How should cost-effectiveness analysis be used in health technology coverage decisions? Evidence from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence approach.成本效益分析应如何用于卫生技术覆盖决策?来自英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所方法的证据。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007 Apr;12(2):73-9. doi: 10.1258/135581907780279521.
6
Reallocating resources: how should the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence guide disinvestment efforts in the National Health Service?资源重新分配:英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所应如何指导国民医疗服务体系中的撤资工作?
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007 Jul;12(3):160-5. doi: 10.1258/135581907781542987.
7
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
8
Providing guidance to the NHS: The Scottish Medicines Consortium and the National Institute for Clinical Excellence compared.为英国国家医疗服务体系提供指导:苏格兰药品联盟与国家临床优化研究所对比研究
Health Policy. 2006 Apr;76(2):134-43. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.05.006. Epub 2005 Jun 27.
9
NICE's use of cost effectiveness as an exemplar of a deliberative process.国家卫生与临床优化研究所将成本效益用作审议过程的一个范例。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2006 Jul;1(Pt 3):299-318. doi: 10.1017/S1744133106004026.
10
Patients' views of explicit rationing: what are the implications for health service decision-making?患者对明确的医疗资源配给的看法:对医疗服务决策有何影响?
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003 Jul;8(3):183-6. doi: 10.1258/135581903322029557.

引用本文的文献

1
Does health technology assessment compromise access to pharmaceuticals?卫生技术评估是否会影响药品的可及性?
Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Apr;24(3):437-451. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01484-4. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
2
Societal values in the allocation of healthcare resources: is it all about the health gain?社会价值观在医疗资源配置中的作用:是否全在于健康收益?
Patient. 2011;4(4):207-25. doi: 10.2165/11588880-000000000-00000.
3
Health technology funding decision-making processes around the world: the same, yet different.全球卫生技术资金决策过程:大同小异。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2011 Jun;29(6):475-95. doi: 10.2165/11586420-000000000-00000.