Suppr超能文献

英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)对癌症患者友好吗?

Has NICE been nice to cancer?

作者信息

Summerhayes Maxwell, Catchpole Paul

机构信息

Medical Department, Roche Products, Hexagon Place, 6 Falcon Way, Shire Park, Welwyn Garden City AL7 1TW, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2006 Nov;42(17):2881-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.08.013. Epub 2006 Oct 27.

Abstract

This article reviews the work of England's National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the area of cancer treatment since it was established in 1999. NICE provides guidance to the National Health Service (NHS) in England and Wales on the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of therapeutic interventions and aims to support uniform and evidence-based care. Its most high profile work involves making judgements on whether new drug treatments should be available to NHS patients. Over 20 appraisals of anticancer drugs have now been completed by NICE; most have endorsed the availability of the reviewed agent, which is good news for cancer patients. Unfortunately, positive guidance does not, necessarily, eradicate inequalities of access. There are also concerns relating to access to drugs during the period when NICE guidance is being developed and for patients requiring treatments--often for less common cancers--which are not referred to NICE for appraisal.

摘要

本文回顾了英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)自1999年成立以来在癌症治疗领域的工作。NICE就治疗干预措施的临床和成本效益向英格兰和威尔士的国民医疗服务体系(NHS)提供指导,旨在支持统一且基于证据的医疗服务。其最受瞩目的工作包括判断NHS患者是否应能使用新药治疗。NICE现已完成了20多项抗癌药物评估;大多数评估都认可了所审查药物的可用性,这对癌症患者来说是个好消息。不幸的是,积极的指导并不一定能消除获取药物方面的不平等现象。在NICE制定指导期间以及对于需要治疗(通常是针对不太常见癌症)但未提交给NICE进行评估的患者而言,药物获取方面也存在问题。

相似文献

1
Has NICE been nice to cancer?
Eur J Cancer. 2006 Nov;42(17):2881-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.08.013. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
2
Working with NICE.
J Fam Health Care. 2007;17(4):113-4.
3
The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence and its role in assessing the value of new cancer treatments in England and Wales.
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Aug 1;17(15):4930-5. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2510. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
7
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
8
Providing guidance to the NHS: The Scottish Medicines Consortium and the National Institute for Clinical Excellence compared.
Health Policy. 2006 Apr;76(2):134-43. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.05.006. Epub 2005 Jun 27.
9
NICE's use of cost effectiveness as an exemplar of a deliberative process.
Health Econ Policy Law. 2006 Jul;1(Pt 3):299-318. doi: 10.1017/S1744133106004026.
10
Patients' views of explicit rationing: what are the implications for health service decision-making?
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003 Jul;8(3):183-6. doi: 10.1258/135581903322029557.

引用本文的文献

1
Does health technology assessment compromise access to pharmaceuticals?
Eur J Health Econ. 2023 Apr;24(3):437-451. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01484-4. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
2
Societal values in the allocation of healthcare resources: is it all about the health gain?
Patient. 2011;4(4):207-25. doi: 10.2165/11588880-000000000-00000.
3
Health technology funding decision-making processes around the world: the same, yet different.
Pharmacoeconomics. 2011 Jun;29(6):475-95. doi: 10.2165/11586420-000000000-00000.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验