Suppr超能文献

无现场外科支持的非急诊冠状动脉血管成形术:一项评估低风险患者结局的随机研究。

Nonemergent coronary angioplasty without on-site surgical backup: a randomized study evaluating outcomes in low-risk patients.

作者信息

Melberg Tor, Nilsen Dennis W T, Larsen Alf Inge, Barvik Ståle, Bonarjee Vernon, Kuiper Karel K-J, Nordrehaug Jan Erik

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2006 Nov;152(5):888-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.06.026.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in nonemergent patients with coronary artery disease in hospitals without on-site cardiac surgery backup is still controversial. To prospectively evaluate a set of low procedural risk criteria for PCI, patients with stable or unstable angina were randomized to treatment in either a community hospital, which had all supportive services except for on-site cardiac surgery, or a regional surgical hospital 213 km away.

METHODS AND RESULTS

During a 4-year period, 609 (57%) of 1064 consecutive patients with stable or unstable angina who underwent coronary angiography at a teaching community hospital in Norway fulfilled the predefined low-risk criteria for PCI. The patients were randomized to treatment at either the community hospital (n = 305) or at the regional hospital (n = 304). The angiographic success rate (96% at both hospitals) and number of major periprocedural complications (overall 0.3%) were equal at the 2 hospitals. In particular, there were no deaths or need for urgent transfer to cardiac surgery. At 6 months of clinical follow-up, there was a significant higher major adverse cardiac event rate rate at the community hospital, compared with the regional hospital (6.9% vs 2.3%, respectively, P = .03) because of more repeat target vessel revascularizations. Improvement in angina functional class and exercise capacity was similar in both groups. The excluded high-risk PCI patients had higher 6-month major adverse cardiac event compared with all low-risk patients (8.4% vs 4.3%, respectively, P = .01).

CONCLUSION

Selected nonemergent patients can, based on angiography, safely undergo PCI at hospitals without cardiac surgery backup. The angiographic selection criteria identified high-risk patients, which had worsened outcome at 6 months of follow-up.

摘要

背景

在没有现场心脏手术支持的医院中,对非急诊冠心病患者进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)仍存在争议。为了前瞻性评估一套PCI低手术风险标准,将稳定型或不稳定型心绞痛患者随机分配至一家社区医院或一家距离213公里远的地区外科医院接受治疗,该社区医院除了没有现场心脏手术外具备所有支持性服务。

方法与结果

在4年期间,挪威一家教学社区医院连续1064例接受冠状动脉造影的稳定型或不稳定型心绞痛患者中,609例(57%)符合预先定义的PCI低风险标准。这些患者被随机分配至社区医院(n = 305)或地区医院(n = 304)接受治疗。两家医院的血管造影成功率(均为96%)和主要围手术期并发症数量(总体为0.3%)相当。特别是,没有死亡病例或需要紧急转至心脏外科手术。在6个月的临床随访中,由于更多的靶血管再次血运重建,社区医院的主要不良心脏事件发生率显著高于地区医院(分别为6.9%和2.3%,P = .03)。两组患者心绞痛功能分级和运动能力的改善情况相似。被排除的高风险PCI患者6个月时的主要不良心脏事件发生率高于所有低风险患者(分别为8.4%和4.3%,P = .01)。

结论

根据血管造影结果,部分非急诊患者可在没有心脏手术支持的医院安全地接受PCI治疗。血管造影选择标准识别出了高风险患者,这些患者在随访6个月时预后较差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验