Luo Dianhong, Luo Yan, He Yun, Zhang Haifeng, Zhang Rong, Li Xianghong, Dobrucki Wawrzyniec L, Sinusas Al J, Sessa William C, Min Wang
Interdepartmental Program in Vascular Biology and Transplantation, Department of Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, BCMM 454, 295 Congress Ave., New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Am J Pathol. 2006 Nov;169(5):1886-98. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.060603.
We have previously shown that tumor necrosis factor (TNF) acts via its two receptors TNFR1 and TNFR2 to elicit distinct signaling pathways in vascular endothelial cells (ECs). Here we used a femoral artery ligation model to demonstrate that TNFR1-knockout (KO) mice had enhanced, whereas TNFR2-KO had reduced, capacity in clinical recovery, limb perfusion, and ischemic reserve capacity compared with the wild-type mice. Consistently, ischemia-initiated collateral growth (arteriogenesis) in the upper limb and capillary formation and vessel maturation (angiogenesis) in the lower limb were enhanced in TNFR1-KO but were reduced in TNFR2-KO mice. Furthermore, our results suggest that vascular proliferation, but not infiltration of macrophages and lymphocytes, accounted for the phenotypic differences between the TNFR1-KO and TNFR2-KO mice. In wild-type animals TNFR2 protein in vascular endothelium was highly up-regulated in response to ischemia, leading to increased TNFR2-specific signaling as determined by the formation TNFR2-TRAF2 complex and activation of TNFR2-specific kinase Bmx/Etk. In isolated murine ECs, activation of TNFR2 induced nuclear factor-kappaB-dependent reporter gene expression, EC survival, and migration. In contrast, activation of TNFR1 caused inhibition of EC migration and EC apoptosis. These data demonstrate that TNFR1 and TNFR2 play differential roles in ischemia-mediated arteriogenesis and angiogenesis, partly because of their opposite effects on EC survival and migration.
我们之前已经表明,肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)通过其两个受体TNFR1和TNFR2发挥作用,在血管内皮细胞(ECs)中引发不同的信号通路。在此,我们使用股动脉结扎模型来证明,与野生型小鼠相比,TNFR1基因敲除(KO)小鼠在临床恢复、肢体灌注和缺血储备能力方面有所增强,而TNFR2-KO小鼠则有所降低。一致的是,TNFR1-KO小鼠上肢缺血引发的侧支生长(动脉生成)以及下肢的毛细血管形成和血管成熟(血管生成)增强,而TNFR2-KO小鼠则减弱。此外,我们的结果表明,血管增殖而非巨噬细胞和淋巴细胞的浸润导致了TNFR1-KO和TNFR2-KO小鼠之间的表型差异。在野生型动物中,血管内皮中的TNFR2蛋白在缺血反应中高度上调,导致TNFR2特异性信号增加,这由TNFR2-TRAF2复合物的形成和TNFR2特异性激酶Bmx/Etk的激活所决定。在分离的小鼠内皮细胞中,TNFR2的激活诱导核因子-κB依赖性报告基因表达、内皮细胞存活和迁移。相反,TNFR1的激活导致内皮细胞迁移抑制和内皮细胞凋亡。这些数据表明,TNFR1和TNFR2在缺血介导的动脉生成和血管生成中发挥不同作用,部分原因是它们对内皮细胞存活和迁移具有相反的影响。
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010-4-15
J Clin Invest. 2006-9
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012-6-28
Am J Transplant. 2009-9-25
Ann Biomed Eng. 2025-4-10
J Mol Cell Cardiol Plus. 2024-9-17
Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024-10-16
Cell Death Differ. 2023-5
Med Oncol. 2022-9-29
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022-2-27
J Clin Invest. 2006-9
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005-8-2
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005-10
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005-1-4
Curr Med Chem. 2004-8