• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将消费者的观点纳入护理能力政策决策中。

Factoring consumers' perspectives into policy decisions for nursing competence.

作者信息

Lazarus Jean B, Lee N Genell

机构信息

Alabama Board of Nursing, Montgomery, USA.

出版信息

Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2006 Aug;7(3):195-207. doi: 10.1177/1527154406291938.

DOI:10.1177/1527154406291938
PMID:17071706
Abstract

Health care delivery competence and accountability have typically been defined from providers' perspectives, rather than those of consumers as purchasers of services. In 1999, in the face of broad public concern about nursing competence the Alabama Board of Nursing developed an accountability model that established consumers at the center of the model and placed accountability for competent nursing practice at all levels of providers including regulatory agencies, health care organizations, educators, and licensees. The Board then authorized two research projects involving first, consumers perceptions on nursing competence and regulation, and second, comparing their perceptions with those of licensees, nurse educators, and organizational leaders (N = 1,127). Comparative data evidenced significant differences between consumers' and other participants' perceptions. This article highlights how policy implications derived from research resulted in regulatory changes for nursing competence. Five years of progress in policy changes made in the interest of public safety are summarized.

摘要

医疗服务提供能力和问责制通常是从提供者的角度来界定的,而非从作为服务购买者的消费者角度。1999年,面对公众对护理能力的广泛关注,阿拉巴马州护理委员会制定了一个问责模式,该模式将消费者置于核心位置,并将包括监管机构、医疗保健组织、教育工作者和持照者在内的各级提供者提供胜任护理实践的问责制。该委员会随后批准了两个研究项目,第一个项目是关于消费者对护理能力和监管的看法,第二个项目是将他们的看法与持照者、护理教育工作者和组织领导者的看法进行比较(N = 1127)。比较数据表明消费者与其他参与者的看法存在显著差异。本文重点介绍了研究得出的政策影响如何导致了护理能力监管方面的变化。总结了为公共安全利益而进行的政策变革五年的进展情况。

相似文献

1
Factoring consumers' perspectives into policy decisions for nursing competence.将消费者的观点纳入护理能力政策决策中。
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2006 Aug;7(3):195-207. doi: 10.1177/1527154406291938.
2
Nursing competence--an evolving regulatory issue in Kentucky.护理能力——肯塔基州一个不断演变的监管问题。
Nurs Adm Q. 1998 Fall;23(1):24-8. doi: 10.1097/00006216-199823010-00007.
3
Returning to competence after discipline.受惩戒后恢复胜任能力。
JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul. 2001 Sep;3(3):88-91. doi: 10.1097/00128488-200109000-00005.
4
The holistic worldview in action: evolution of holistic nurses certification programs.行动中的整体世界观:整体护理认证项目的发展
J Holist Nurs. 2013 Dec;31(4):303-13. doi: 10.1177/0898010113499975. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
5
Is transition of internationally educated nurses a regulatory issue?国际教育背景护士的转型是一个监管问题吗?
Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2010 Feb;11(1):62-70. doi: 10.1177/1527154410371382.
6
Defining 'competency' in nursing (Part I): A policy review.界定护理领域的“能力”(第一部分):政策综述
J Clin Nurs. 1997 Sep;6(5):347-54.
7
Understanding certification, licensure, and credentialing: a guide for the new nurse practitioner.了解认证、执照和资格认定:新执业护士指南。
J Pediatr Health Care. 2010 May-Jun;24(3):203-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2009.09.006. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
8
Integrating the National Council of State Boards of Nursing Clinical Judgment Model Into Nursing Educational Frameworks.将美国国家护士委员会临床判断模型纳入护理教育框架。
J Nurs Educ. 2019 Feb 1;58(2):72-78. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20190122-03.
9
Credentialing study report submitted to ANA.提交给美国护士协会的资质认证研究报告。
Am Nurse. 1979 Mar 20;11(3):1, 10, 16.
10
The perianesthesia nurse as advocate in the policy arena: driving the health care agenda.麻醉后护理护士在政策领域作为倡导者:推动医疗保健议程。
J Perianesth Nurs. 2008 Jun;23(3):183-94; quiz 192-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2008.03.007.