Baumgartner Helmut
Abteilung für Kardiologie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Osterreich.
Herz. 2006 Oct;31(7):664-9. doi: 10.1007/s00059-006-2871-1.
While there is generell agreement that patients with aortic stenosis (AS) who have already developed symptoms, such as exertional dyspnea, angina or dizziness and syncope, require urgent surgery because of their otherwise very poor outcome, the management of asymptomatic severe AS remains controversial. Although prevention of sudden death, prevention of irreversible myocardial damage, lower operative risk and a possible short duration of the asymptomatic phase of the disease have been proposed as arguments for early elective surgery, currently available data do not support that the risk of surgery and prosthesis-related long-term complications can generally be outweighed by a potential benefit. Thus, surgery cannot be recommended for all asymptomatic patients. Since patients often do not report their symptoms immediately and waiting lists for surgery exist in some countries, risk stratification with selection of those patients who are likely to develop symptoms and require surgery within a short time period seems to be the ideal approach. The most important predictors of outcome are the degree of valvular calcification, the hemodynamic progression rate, the development of symptoms during exercise testing, and plasma levels of cardiac neurohomones.
虽然普遍认为,已经出现症状(如劳力性呼吸困难、心绞痛或头晕及晕厥)的主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者,因其预后极差而需要紧急手术,但无症状重度AS的治疗仍存在争议。尽管有人提出预防猝死、预防不可逆心肌损伤、降低手术风险以及疾病无症状期可能较短等理由支持早期择期手术,但现有数据并不支持手术风险和假体相关长期并发症的风险总体上能被潜在益处所抵消。因此,不能建议对所有无症状患者进行手术。由于患者往往不会立即报告症状,且一些国家存在手术等候名单,对患者进行风险分层,选择那些可能很快出现症状并需要手术的患者,似乎是理想的方法。预后的最重要预测因素是瓣膜钙化程度、血流动力学进展速度、运动试验期间症状的出现以及心脏神经激素的血浆水平。