Fortson Beverly L, Scotti Joseph R, Del Ben Kevin S, Chen Yi-Chuen
Department of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
J Trauma Stress. 2006 Oct;19(5):709-20. doi: 10.1002/jts.20165.
The reliability and validity of Internet-based questionnaires were assessed in a sample of undergraduates (N = 411) by comparing data collected via the Internet with data collected in a more traditional format. A 2 x 2 x 2 repeated measures factorial design was used, forming four groups: Paper-Paper, Paper-Internet, Internet-Paper, and Internet-Internet. Scores on measures of trauma exposure, depression, and posttraumatic stress symptoms formed the dependent variables. Statistical analyses demonstrated that the psychometric properties of Internet-based questionnaires are similar to those established via formats that are more traditional. Questionnaire format and presentation order did not affect rates of psychological symptoms endorsed by participants. Researchers can feel comfortable that Internet data collection is a viable--and reliable--means for conducting trauma research.
通过将通过互联网收集的数据与以更传统格式收集的数据进行比较,在一组本科生样本(N = 411)中评估了基于互联网的问卷的信度和效度。采用了2×2×2重复测量析因设计,形成了四组:纸质-纸质、纸质-互联网、互联网-纸质和互联网-互联网。创伤暴露、抑郁和创伤后应激症状测量的得分构成了因变量。统计分析表明,基于互联网的问卷的心理测量特性与通过更传统格式建立的问卷相似。问卷格式和呈现顺序并未影响参与者认可的心理症状发生率。研究人员可以放心,互联网数据收集是进行创伤研究的一种可行且可靠的手段。