Suppr超能文献

一项针对大学生样本的网络创伤应激调查的信度和效度

Reliability and validity of an Internet traumatic stress survey with a college student sample.

作者信息

Fortson Beverly L, Scotti Joseph R, Del Ben Kevin S, Chen Yi-Chuen

机构信息

Department of Psychology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma Stress. 2006 Oct;19(5):709-20. doi: 10.1002/jts.20165.

Abstract

The reliability and validity of Internet-based questionnaires were assessed in a sample of undergraduates (N = 411) by comparing data collected via the Internet with data collected in a more traditional format. A 2 x 2 x 2 repeated measures factorial design was used, forming four groups: Paper-Paper, Paper-Internet, Internet-Paper, and Internet-Internet. Scores on measures of trauma exposure, depression, and posttraumatic stress symptoms formed the dependent variables. Statistical analyses demonstrated that the psychometric properties of Internet-based questionnaires are similar to those established via formats that are more traditional. Questionnaire format and presentation order did not affect rates of psychological symptoms endorsed by participants. Researchers can feel comfortable that Internet data collection is a viable--and reliable--means for conducting trauma research.

摘要

通过将通过互联网收集的数据与以更传统格式收集的数据进行比较,在一组本科生样本(N = 411)中评估了基于互联网的问卷的信度和效度。采用了2×2×2重复测量析因设计,形成了四组:纸质-纸质、纸质-互联网、互联网-纸质和互联网-互联网。创伤暴露、抑郁和创伤后应激症状测量的得分构成了因变量。统计分析表明,基于互联网的问卷的心理测量特性与通过更传统格式建立的问卷相似。问卷格式和呈现顺序并未影响参与者认可的心理症状发生率。研究人员可以放心,互联网数据收集是进行创伤研究的一种可行且可靠的手段。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验