Moreno Rui, Afonso Susana
UCIP, Santo António dos Capuchos Hospital, Lisbon Medical Centre (Central Zone), Lisbon, Portugal.
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2006 Dec;12(6):619-23. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e328010c800.
Since the development of the first general outcome prediction models, these instruments have been widely used in the intensive care unit. Last updated in the early 1990s, these models are now severely outdated.
In recent months, researchers and users assisted in several attempts at improving the existing models through customization or expansion or in the development of new models, such as the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) 3 and the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV.
Although not similar, especially in the choice of the reference population, these models aim at replacing older general outcome models, the predictions from which no longer reflect the current case-mix outcomes of intensive care. The objective of this review is to present and discuss, to the clinician working in the intensive care unit, these different strategies and to give an updated version of the general outcome prediction models available in 2006.
自首个通用结局预测模型问世以来,这些工具在重症监护病房中得到了广泛应用。这些模型上一次更新是在20世纪90年代初,如今已严重过时。
近几个月来,研究人员和使用者协助进行了多次尝试,通过定制或扩展来改进现有模型,或开发新模型,如简化急性生理学评分(SAPS)3和急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)IV。
尽管这些模型并不相似,尤其是在参考人群的选择上,但它们旨在取代旧的通用结局模型,因为旧模型的预测已不再反映当前重症监护的病例组合结局。本综述的目的是向重症监护病房的临床医生介绍并讨论这些不同的策略,并提供2006年可用的通用结局预测模型的更新版本。