• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年高血压患者住院治疗高费用的预测因素

Predictors for high costs of hospital care in elderly hypertensive patients.

作者信息

Linjer Erland, Jörnmark Jan, Hedner Thomas, Jönsson Bengt

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Blood Press. 2006;15(4):245-50. doi: 10.1080/08037050600912237.

DOI:10.1080/08037050600912237
PMID:17078183
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyse predictors of high cost of care in elderly hypertensive patients, in particular costs related to short-term (<10 days) and long-term (< or = 10 days) institutional care.

DESIGN

Health Economy (HE) sub-study in the Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension-2 (STOP Hypertension-2).

SETTING

Outpatient clinics, hospitals and nursing homes in Sweden.

SUBJECTS

Elderly (70-84 years) patients (n=6614) from the STOP Hypertension-2 cohort with a systolic or diastolic hypertension, or a combination thereof, were included.

METHODS

Costs of institutional care were analysed and categorized as short-term (<10 days or long-term care (> or = 10 days). Costs were related to individual patients and calculations were made during follow-up in STOP Hypertension-2 from inclusion to end of study. Data was available from 99% of all scheduled visits during the median 5.3 years of follow-up in the 6614 elderly hypertensive patients.

RESULTS

A multivariate analysis of potential predictors for inpatient short-term or long-term care demonstrated that several clinical factors within the groups of target organ damage (TOD), associated clinical conditions (ACC), as well as additional risk factors (RF) predicted for an increased probability of inpatient care in elderly hypertensives. Specifically, predictors for heart failure (OR 1.73, p=0.005), diabetes (OR 1.36, p<0.0005) and older age (OR 1.05, p<0.0001). Predictors at entry for long-term care (> or = 10 days) were; presence of ischaemic heart disease (OR 1.65, p<0.0001), diabetes mellitus (OR 1.32, p=0.012), female gender (OR 0.80, p=0.0003) as well as older age (OR 1.02, p=0.046). High total costs for this cohort of elderly hypertensive patients were recorded in the group subjected to long-term care for cardiovascular as well as non-cardiovascular reasons. Male gender (p=0.004) and stroke (p=0.06) remained predictors for high costs for hospital care while stroke (p<0.0001) and old age (p<0.0001) predicted for high costs for nursing home care.

CONCLUSION

In elderly hypertensives in STOP Hypertension-2, presence of cardiac disease, stroke, diabetes and older age at entry increased the probability as well as costs for both short- and long-term care. Level of systolic or diastolic blood pressure did not predict for hospitalization or cost outcome. Our results provide an economic argument for strict risk reduction focus in the management of elderly high-risk hypertensive patients.

摘要

目的

分析老年高血压患者护理费用高昂的预测因素,尤其是与短期(<10天)和长期(≥10天)机构护理相关的费用。

设计

瑞典老年高血压患者试验-2(STOP高血压-2)中的健康经济(HE)子研究。

地点

瑞典的门诊诊所、医院和养老院。

研究对象

纳入了STOP高血压-2队列中年龄在70 - 84岁、患有收缩期或舒张期高血压或两者皆有的患者(n = 6614)。

方法

分析机构护理费用并分为短期(<10天)或长期护理(≥10天)。费用与个体患者相关,并在STOP高血压-2从纳入到研究结束的随访期间进行计算。在6614名老年高血压患者中位5.3年的随访期间,99%的预定就诊数据可用。

结果

对住院短期或长期护理潜在预测因素的多变量分析表明,靶器官损害(TOD)组、相关临床病症(ACC)组以及其他风险因素(RF)中的几个临床因素预测老年高血压患者住院护理概率增加。具体而言,心力衰竭(比值比1.73,p = 0.005)、糖尿病(比值比1.36,p < 0.0005)和高龄(比值比1.05,p < 0.0001)是预测因素。长期护理(≥10天)入院时的预测因素为:存在缺血性心脏病(比值比1.65,p < 0.0001)、糖尿病(比值比1.32,p = 0.012)、女性(比值比0.80,p = 0.0003)以及高龄(比值比1.02,p = 0.046)。该组老年高血压患者因心血管及非心血管原因接受长期护理的费用最高。男性(p = 0.004)和中风(p = 0.06)仍是医院护理费用高昂的预测因素,而中风(p < 0.0001)和高龄(p < 0.0001)预测养老院护理费用高昂。

结论

在STOP高血压-2的老年高血压患者中,入院时存在心脏病、中风、糖尿病和高龄会增加短期和长期护理的概率及费用。收缩压或舒张压水平不能预测住院情况或费用结果。我们的结果为在老年高危高血压患者管理中严格关注风险降低提供了经济依据。

相似文献

1
Predictors for high costs of hospital care in elderly hypertensive patients.老年高血压患者住院治疗高费用的预测因素
Blood Press. 2006;15(4):245-50. doi: 10.1080/08037050600912237.
2
Cost analysis of different pharmacological treatment strategies in elderly hypertensives.老年高血压患者不同药物治疗策略的成本分析
Blood Press. 2005;14(2):107-13. doi: 10.1080/08037050510008940.
3
Cardiovascular events in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension. A subgroup analysis of treatment strategies in STOP-Hypertension-2.老年单纯收缩期高血压患者的心血管事件。STOP-Hypertension-2研究中治疗策略的亚组分析。
Blood Press. 2004;13(3):137-41. doi: 10.1080/08037050410014944.
4
Assessment of the association between blood pressure control and health care resource use.血压控制与医疗资源使用之间关联的评估。
Clin Ther. 2001 Oct;23(10):1773-82. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(01)80143-0.
5
Comparison of health costs associated with treatment of hypertension with a calcium channel blocker and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor in the United States and Japan.美国和日本使用钙通道阻滞剂与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗高血压的健康成本比较。
Hypertens Res. 2006 May;29(5):333-8. doi: 10.1291/hypres.29.333.
6
Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT).高危高血压患者随机接受血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或钙通道阻滞剂与利尿剂治疗的主要结局:抗高血压和降脂治疗预防心脏病发作试验(ALLHAT)
JAMA. 2002 Dec 18;288(23):2981-97. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.23.2981.
7
Patterns of persistence with antihypertensive medications in newly diagnosed hypertensive patients in Italy: a retrospective cohort study in primary care.意大利新诊断高血压患者的降压药物持续治疗模式:一项初级保健中的回顾性队列研究
J Hypertens. 2005 Nov;23(11):2093-100. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000186832.41125.8a.
8
Costs of current antihypertensive therapy in Switzerland: an economic evaluation of 3,489 patients in primary care.瑞士当前抗高血压治疗的成本:初级保健中 3489 名患者的经济评估。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2013 Oct 25;143:w13854. doi: 10.4414/smw.2013.13854. eCollection 2013.
9
Compliance with antihypertensive therapy in the elderly: a comparison of fixed-dose combination amlodipine/benazepril versus component-based free-combination therapy.老年人抗高血压治疗的依从性:氨氯地平/贝那普利固定剂量复方制剂与基于成分的自由联合治疗的比较
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2008;8(1):45-50. doi: 10.2165/00129784-200808010-00006.
10
Treatment of uncomplicated hypertension: are ACE inhibitors and calcium channel blockers as effective as diuretics and beta-blockers?单纯性高血压的治疗:血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和钙通道阻滞剂与利尿剂及β受体阻滞剂的疗效相同吗?
J Am Board Fam Pract. 2003 Mar-Apr;16(2):156-64. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.16.2.156-a.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of patient's age on the profitability of inpatient cardiac catheterization: a contribution margin analysis of frequently performed procedures over a 5-year period.患者年龄对住院心脏导管插入术盈利能力的影响:对5年期间频繁实施手术的边际贡献分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 18;17(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-1999-4.
2
Stroke outcome after domiciliary use of opioids in the peri-stroke period.中风急性期在家使用阿片类药物后的中风结局。
J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2015 Oct-Dec;6(4):558-62. doi: 10.4103/0976-3147.165345.
3
Direct costs of hypertensive patients admitted to hospital in Vietnam- a bottom-up micro-costing analysis.
越南高血压患者住院的直接成本——自下而上的微观成本分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct 28;14:514. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0514-4.
4
Instrumental variable methods to assess quality of care the marginal effects of process-of-care on blood pressure change and treatment costs.用于评估医疗质量、护理过程对血压变化的边际效应以及治疗成本的工具变量方法。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2015 Mar-Apr;11(2):e69-83. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2014.07.007. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
5
Hypertension-associated hospitalizations and costs in the United States, 1979-2006.1979 - 2006年美国高血压相关住院情况及费用
Blood Press. 2014 Apr;23(2):126-33. doi: 10.3109/08037051.2013.814751. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
6
Pharmacoeconomics and aging.药物经济学与老龄化。
Drugs Aging. 2009 Dec;26 Suppl 1:75-87. doi: 10.2165/11534680-000000000-00000.