Mavroforou A, Giannoukas A, Michalodimitrakis Emmanuel
Department of Forensic Sciences, University of Crete Medical School, Heraklion.
Med Law. 2006 Sep;25(3):427-34.
The experience from the scandals in hospitals at Liverpool and Bristol in the UK where retention of tissue and organs was undertaken without the consent of the parents and relatives raised serious concerns regarding the efficacy of the existing Human Tissue Act 1961, in England and the operation of the law by medical practitioners. In the aftermath of these damaging scandals a combination of public distrust and government overreaction has led to the enactment of new legislation, the Human Tissue Act 2004, which is aiming to prevent any further instances of the retention of organs and tissue from dead children or adults without their next of kin's consent or knowledge. However, scientists have expressed concerns that such changes might seriously endanger several medical research programmes, and also tissue and organ donation for transplantation. The aim of this article is to highlight important issues raised by existing practice in the post-mortem examinations in the UK and the lessons learnt from this and to discuss the benefits and the potential problems arising from the new Act.
英国利物浦和布里斯托尔的医院曾发生丑闻,未经父母和亲属同意就留存组织和器官,这引发了人们对1961年英格兰现行《人体组织法》的效力以及医生执法情况的严重担忧。在这些破坏性丑闻之后,公众的不信任和政府的过度反应导致了新立法《2004年人体组织法》的颁布,该法旨在防止在未经近亲同意或知晓的情况下,再次出现留存死童或成人器官及组织的情况。然而,科学家们担心这些变化可能会严重危及几个医学研究项目,以及组织和器官移植捐赠。本文旨在突出英国尸检现有做法引发的重要问题以及从中吸取的教训,并讨论新法案带来的益处和潜在问题。