Defazio Giovanni, Martino Davide, Aniello Maria Stella, Masi Gianluca, Gigante Angelo, Bhatia Kailash, Livrea Paolo, Berardelli Alfredo
Department of Neurologic and Psychiatric Sciences, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
J Neurol Sci. 2006 Dec 21;251(1-2):29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2006.08.009. Epub 2006 Oct 31.
Primary adult-onset dystonia is thought to be partly genetic, but families large enough for a genome wide search are difficult to find. We examined the first-degree relatives of 76 primary adult-onset dystonia patients to assess the feasibility of model-free nonparametric methods that allow either screening of candidate loci (case-control design, transmission disequilibrium test [TDT], and sibling-TDT [S-TDT]) or identification of novel genes (affected sib-pair [ASP] method). Among the examined relatives, 1/34 parents, 13/149 siblings and 10/125 offspring were affected by adult-onset dystonia. The predicted sample sizes to detect a gene conferring an Odds ratio of 3.0 were 99 for case-control and TDT methodology, 148 for S-TDT, and 107 to 173 for an ASP study assuming three major loci. Based on our family structure, TDT, S-TDT, and ASP methods would required screening of about 220, 700, and 580 to 939 probands respectively. Analysing subpopulations with different types of dystonia, TDT required fewer probands with cervical/hand dystonia, S-TDT needed fewer probands with cranial dystonia. These sample size estimates suggest that the S-TDT may be feasible, whereas collection of cases for both TDT and ASP approaches would represent a major collaborative challenge.
原发性成人起病性肌张力障碍被认为部分具有遗传性,但难以找到足够大的家族进行全基因组搜索。我们检查了76例原发性成人起病性肌张力障碍患者的一级亲属,以评估无模型非参数方法的可行性,这些方法可用于筛选候选基因座(病例对照设计、传递不平衡检验[TDT]和同胞TDT[S-TDT])或鉴定新基因(受累同胞对[ASP]方法)。在所检查的亲属中,34名父母中有1名、149名兄弟姐妹中有13名、125名后代中有10名患有成人起病性肌张力障碍。假设存在三个主要基因座,对于病例对照和TDT方法,检测赋予比值比为3.0的基因所需的预测样本量为99,S-TDT为148,ASP研究为107至173。基于我们的家族结构,TDT、S-TDT和ASP方法分别需要筛查约220、700以及580至939名先证者。分析不同类型肌张力障碍的亚组时,TDT筛查颈部/手部肌张力障碍的先证者较少,S-TDT筛查头部肌张力障碍的先证者较少。这些样本量估计表明S-TDT可能可行,而TDT和ASP方法收集病例都将是一项重大的合作挑战。