• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

统一医学语言系统对急诊医学主诉的覆盖范围。

Unified medical language system coverage of emergency-medicine chief complaints.

作者信息

Travers Debbie A, Haas Stephanie W

机构信息

School of Nursing, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Dec;13(12):1319-23. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.06.054. Epub 2006 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1197/j.aem.2006.06.054
PMID:17079790
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emergency department (ED) chief-complaint (CC) data increasingly are important for clinical-care and secondary uses such as syndromic surveillance. There is no widely used ED CC vocabulary, but experts have suggested evaluation of existing health-care vocabularies for ED CC.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the ED CC coverage in existing biomedical vocabularies from the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS).

METHODS

The study sample included all CC entries for all visits to three EDs over one year. The authors used a special-purpose text processor to clean CC entries, which then were mapped to UMLS concepts. The UMLS match rates then were calculated and analyzed for matching concepts and nonmatching entries.

RESULTS

A total of 203,509 ED visits was included. After cleaning with the text processor, 82% of the CCs matched a UMLS concept. The authors identified 5,617 unique UMLS concepts in the ED CC data, but many were used for only one or two visits. One thousand one hundred thirty-six CC concepts were used more than ten times and covered 99% of all the ED visits. The largest biomedical vocabulary in the UMLS is the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT), which included concepts for 79% of all ED CC entries. However, some common CCs were not found in SNOMED CT.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors found that ED CC concepts are well covered by the UMLS and that the best source of vocabulary coverage is from SNOMED CT. There are some gaps in UMLS and SNOMED CT coverage of ED CCs. Future work on vocabulary control for ED CCs should build upon existing vocabularies.

摘要

背景

急诊科(ED)的主诉(CC)数据对于临床护理以及诸如症状监测等二次应用越来越重要。目前尚无广泛使用的急诊科CC词汇表,但专家建议对现有的医疗保健词汇表进行急诊科CC评估。

目的

评估统一医学语言系统(UMLS)中现有生物医学词汇表对急诊科CC的覆盖情况。

方法

研究样本包括一年内三家急诊科所有就诊的所有CC条目。作者使用专用文本处理器清理CC条目,然后将其映射到UMLS概念。然后计算并分析UMLS匹配率,以确定匹配的概念和不匹配的条目。

结果

共纳入203,509次急诊科就诊。使用文本处理器清理后,82%的CC与UMLS概念匹配。作者在急诊科CC数据中识别出5617个独特的UMLS概念,但许多概念仅被使用一两次。1136个CC概念被使用超过十次,覆盖了所有急诊科就诊的99%。UMLS中最大的生物医学词汇表是医学临床术语系统命名法(SNOMED CT),其中包含所有急诊科CC条目中79%的概念。然而,SNOMED CT中未发现一些常见的CC。

结论

作者发现UMLS很好地覆盖了急诊科CC概念,词汇覆盖的最佳来源是SNOMED CT。UMLS和SNOMED CT在急诊科CC覆盖方面存在一些差距。未来关于急诊科CC词汇控制的工作应基于现有词汇表展开。

相似文献

1
Unified medical language system coverage of emergency-medicine chief complaints.统一医学语言系统对急诊医学主诉的覆盖范围。
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Dec;13(12):1319-23. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.06.054. Epub 2006 Nov 1.
2
Evaluation of emergency medical text processor, a system for cleaning chief complaint text data.急诊医学文本处理器的评估,一种用于清理主诉文本数据的系统。
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Nov;11(11):1170-6. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.08.012.
3
A comparative study on concept representation between the UMLS and the clinical terms in Korean medical records.UMLS与韩医病历临床术语之间概念表示的比较研究
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 1):616-20.
4
The comparative study on concept representation between the UMLS and the clinical terms in Korean medical records.UMLS与韩医病历临床术语之间概念表示的比较研究
Int J Med Inform. 2005 Jan;74(1):67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2004.09.004.
5
A tool for sharing annotated research data: the "Category 0" UMLS (Unified Medical Language System) vocabularies.一种用于共享带注释研究数据的工具:“第0类”统一医学语言系统(UMLS)词汇表。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2003 Jun 16;3:6. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-3-6.
6
Two-Phase chief complaint mapping to the UMLS metathesaurus in Korean electronic medical records.韩国电子病历中双相主诉与统一医学语言系统元词表的映射
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2009 Jan;13(1):78-86. doi: 10.1109/TITB.2008.2007103.
7
Consumers' Use of UMLS Concepts on Social Media: Diabetes-Related Textual Data Analysis in Blog and Social Q&A Sites.消费者在社交媒体上对统一医学语言系统(UMLS)概念的使用:博客和社交问答网站中与糖尿病相关的文本数据分析
JMIR Med Inform. 2016 Nov 24;4(4):e41. doi: 10.2196/medinform.5748.
8
Mapping ICNP Version 1 concepts to SNOMED CT.将国际护理实践分类法第1版概念映射到医学系统命名法临床术语集。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010;160(Pt 2):1109-13.
9
Biosurveillance evaluation of SNOMED CT's terminology (BEST Trial): coverage of chief complaints.SNOMED CT术语的生物监测评估(BEST试验):主诉的覆盖范围
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2008;136:797-802.
10
Evaluation of the content coverage of SNOMED-CT to represent ICNP Version 1 catalogues.评估SNOMED-CT的内容覆盖范围以呈现ICNP第1版目录。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;146:303-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Concept Coverage Analysis of Ophthalmic Infections and Trauma among the Standardized Medical Terminologies SNOMED-CT, ICD-10-CM, and ICD-11.标准化医学术语SNOMED-CT、ICD-10-CM和ICD-11中眼科感染与创伤的概念覆盖分析
Ophthalmol Sci. 2023 May 25;3(4):100337. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2023.100337. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Machine Learning-Based Models for Prediction of Critical Illness at Community, Paramedic, and Hospital Stages.基于机器学习的社区、护理人员和医院阶段危重症预测模型。
Emerg Med Int. 2023 Jun 26;2023:1221704. doi: 10.1155/2023/1221704. eCollection 2023.
3
Improving broad-coverage medical entity linking with semantic type prediction and large-scale datasets.
利用语义类型预测和大规模数据集提高全面的医学实体链接。
J Biomed Inform. 2021 Sep;121:103880. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103880. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
4
Ambiguity in medical concept normalization: An analysis of types and coverage in electronic health record datasets.医学概念规范化中的歧义:电子健康记录数据集的类型和覆盖范围分析。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Mar 1;28(3):516-532. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa269.
5
Identifying Emergency Department Symptom-Based Diagnoses with the Unified Medical Language System.基于统一医学语言系统识别急诊科症状诊断。
West J Emerg Med. 2019 Oct 24;20(6):910-917. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2019.8.44230.
6
Consensus Development of a Modern Ontology of Emergency Department Presenting Problems-The Hierarchical Presenting Problem Ontology (HaPPy).急诊就诊问题现代本体论共识的发展——分层就诊问题本体论(HaPPy)。
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 May;10(3):409-420. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1691842. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
7
Chief complaint-based performance measures: a new focus for acute care quality measurement.基于主诉的绩效指标:急性护理质量测量的新重点。
Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Apr;65(4):387-95. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.07.453. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
8
Extracting semantic lexicons from discharge summaries using machine learning and the C-Value method.使用机器学习和C值方法从出院小结中提取语义词典。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2012;2012:409-16. Epub 2012 Nov 3.