Suppr超能文献

抑郁症作为冠心病的病因和预后因素:对54项观察性研究中146538名参与者的6362例事件进行的荟萃分析。

Depression as an aetiologic and prognostic factor in coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis of 6362 events among 146 538 participants in 54 observational studies.

作者信息

Nicholson Amanda, Kuper Hannah, Hemingway Harry

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London Medical School, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2006 Dec;27(23):2763-74. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl338. Epub 2006 Nov 2.

Abstract

AIMS

With negative treatment trials, the role of depression as an aetiological or prognostic factor in coronary heart disease (CHD) remains controversial. We quantified the effect of depression on CHD, assessing the extent of confounding by coronary risk factors and disease severity.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Meta-analysis of cohort studies measuring depression with follow-up for fatal CHD/incident myocardial infarction (aetiological) or all-cause mortality/fatal CHD (prognostic). We searched MEDLINE and Science Citation Index until December 2003. In 21 aetiological studies, the pooled relative risk of future CHD associated with depression was 1.81 (95% CI 1.53-2.15). Adjusted results were included for 11 studies, with adjustment reducing the crude effect marginally from 2.08 (1.69-2.55) to 1.90 (1.49-2.42). In 34 prognostic studies, the pooled relative risk was 1.80 (1.50-2.15). Results adjusted for left ventricular function result were available in only eight studies; and this attenuated the relative risk from 2.18 to 1.53 (1.11-2.10), a 48% reduction. Both aetiological and prognostic studies without adjusted results had lower unadjusted effect sizes than studies from which adjusted results were included (P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Depression has yet to be established as an independent risk factor for CHD because of incomplete and biased availability of adjustment for conventional risk factors and severity of coronary disease.

摘要

目的

在治疗效果为阴性的试验中,抑郁症作为冠心病(CHD)病因或预后因素的作用仍存在争议。我们量化了抑郁症对冠心病的影响,评估冠状动脉危险因素和疾病严重程度造成的混杂程度。

方法与结果

对测量抑郁症并随访致命性冠心病/新发心肌梗死(病因学)或全因死亡率/致命性冠心病(预后)的队列研究进行荟萃分析。我们检索了截至2003年12月的MEDLINE和科学引文索引。在21项病因学研究中,与抑郁症相关的未来冠心病合并相对风险为1.81(95%可信区间1.53 - 2.15)。11项研究纳入了校正结果,校正后粗效应从2.08(1.69 - 2.55)略有降低至1.90(1.49 - 2.42)。在34项预后研究中,合并相对风险为1.80(1.50 - 2.15)。仅8项研究提供了根据左心室功能结果校正后的结果;这使相对风险从2.18降至1.53(1.11 - 2.10),降低了48%。未校正结果的病因学和预后研究的未校正效应量均低于纳入校正结果的研究(P<0.01)。

结论

由于传统危险因素和冠状动脉疾病严重程度的校正不完整且存在偏差,抑郁症尚未被确立为冠心病的独立危险因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验