Connor Carol McDonald, Craig Holly K, Raudenbush Stephen W, Heavner Krista, Zwolan Teresa A
Florida State University and the Florida Center for Reading Research, Tallahassee, FL 32301, USA.
Ear Hear. 2006 Dec;27(6):628-44. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000240640.59205.42.
The age at which a child receives a cochlear implant seems to be one of the more important predictors of his or her speech and language outcomes. However, understanding the association between age at implantation and child outcomes is complex because a child's age, length of device use, and age at implantation are highly related. In this study, we investigate whether there is an added value to earlier implantation or whether advantages observed in child outcomes are primarily attributable to longer device use at any given age.
Using hierarchical linear modeling, we examined latent-growth curves for 100 children who had received their implants when they were between 1 and 10 yr of age, had used oral communication, and had used their devices for between 1 and 12 yr. Children were divided into four groups based on age at implantation: between 1 and 2.5 yr, between 2.6 and 3.5 yr, between 3.6 and 7 yr, and between 7.1 and 10 yr.
Investigation of growth curves and rates of growth over time revealed an additional value for earlier implantation over and above advantages attributable to longer length of use at any given age. Children who had received their implants before the age of 2.5 yr had exhibited early bursts of growth in consonant-production accuracy and vocabulary and also had significantly stronger outcomes compared with age peers who had received their implants at later ages. The magnitude of the early burst diminished systematically with increasing age at implantation and was not observed for children who were older than 7 yr at implantation for consonant-production accuracy or for children who were over 3.5 yr old at implantation for vocabulary. The impact of age at implantation on children's growth curves differed for speech production and vocabulary.
There seems to be a substantial benefit for both speech and vocabulary outcomes when children receive their implant before the age of 2.5 yr. This benefit may combine a burst of growth after implantation with the impact of increased length of use at any given age. The added advantage (i.e., burst of growth) diminishes systematically with increasing age at implantation.
儿童接受人工耳蜗植入的年龄似乎是其言语和语言发育结果的重要预测因素之一。然而,理解植入年龄与儿童发育结果之间的关联很复杂,因为儿童的年龄、设备使用时长和植入年龄高度相关。在本研究中,我们调查了早期植入是否具有附加价值,或者在儿童发育结果中观察到的优势是否主要归因于在任何给定年龄下更长的设备使用时长。
我们使用分层线性模型,检查了100名年龄在1至10岁之间接受植入、使用口语交流且设备使用时长在1至12年之间的儿童的潜在生长曲线。根据植入年龄将儿童分为四组:1至2.5岁之间、2.6至3.5岁之间、3.6至7岁之间以及7.1至10岁之间。
对生长曲线和随时间的生长速率的调查显示,早期植入除了在任何给定年龄下因使用时长更长而带来的优势之外,还具有附加价值。在2.5岁之前接受植入的儿童在辅音发音准确性和词汇量方面表现出早期的快速增长,并且与在较晚年龄接受植入的同龄人相比,其发育结果也明显更好。随着植入年龄的增加,早期快速增长的幅度系统性地减小,对于植入时年龄超过7岁的儿童,在辅音发音准确性方面未观察到这种早期快速增长;对于植入时年龄超过3.5岁的儿童,在词汇量方面也未观察到这种早期快速增长。植入年龄对儿童生长曲线的影响在言语产生和词汇量方面有所不同。
当儿童在2.5岁之前接受植入时 在言语和词汇量发育结果方面似乎都有显著益处。这种益处可能是植入后快速增长与在任何给定年龄下使用时长增加的影响相结合的结果。随着植入年龄的增加,这种附加优势(即快速增长)会系统性地减小。