Cambra Cristina, Pérez Encarna, Losilla Josep-Maria
Department of Basic, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, (Cerdanyola Del Vallès), Spain.
Department of Psychobiology and Health Sciences Methodology, Faculty of Psychology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, (Cerdanyola Del Vallès) , Spain.
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 11;10(1):e23496. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23496. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
This analytical cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the production of nouns and adjectives in 62 children between the ages 5 and 7, with 31 children having Cochlear Implants (CIs) and 31 children having Typical Hearing (TH). The study compaired their performance in a picture naming test of nouns and adjectives. Poisson regression models were fitted to compare the responses of both groups of children, and intra-subject differences between responses to the noun and adjective naming tasks were also analyzed. The results showed that both groups of children produced the same number of non-responses of nouns and of adjectives and a higher number of correct productions of nouns than of adjectives. However, children with CIs produced more errors when naming adjectives than when naming nouns, while this difference is not observed in children with TH. The comparative analysis between both groups of children indicates that children with CIs produced a higher proportion of non-responses when naming nouns, but the same proportion as children with TH when naming adjectives. Children with CIs also produced fewer correct nouns and adjectives and more errors than children with TH. Vocabulary expansion and repair of production errors in children with CIs should be targeted by speech-language pathologists in intervention programs.
这项分析性横断面研究旨在调查62名5至7岁儿童的名词和形容词产出情况,其中31名儿童植入了人工耳蜗(CI),31名儿童听力正常(TH)。该研究比较了他们在名词和形容词图片命名测试中的表现。采用泊松回归模型比较两组儿童的反应,并分析了名词和形容词命名任务反应之间的受试者内差异。结果表明,两组儿童的名词和形容词无反应数量相同,名词的正确产出数量高于形容词。然而,植入人工耳蜗的儿童在命名形容词时比命名名词时产生更多错误,而听力正常的儿童未观察到这种差异。两组儿童的比较分析表明,植入人工耳蜗的儿童在命名名词时无反应的比例更高,但在命名形容词时与听力正常的儿童比例相同。植入人工耳蜗的儿童正确的名词和形容词也比听力正常的儿童少,错误更多。言语病理学家应在干预计划中针对植入人工耳蜗儿童的词汇扩展和产出错误修复。