Berman Norman B, Fall Leslie H, Maloney Christopher G, Levine David A
Department of Pediatrics, Dartmouth Medical School, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008 Aug;13(3):373-83. doi: 10.1007/s10459-006-9041-3. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
This reflection is based on the premise that clinical education can be improved by more widespread use of computer-assisted instruction (CAI) and that a roadmap will enable more medical educators to begin using CAI. The rationale for CAI use includes many of its inherent features such as incorporation of multimedia and interactivity yet the use of CAI remains limited, apparently because educators are not convinced about the role for CAI. Barriers to CAI use are discussed including misinterpretation of the literature for CAI effectiveness; a disconnect between CAI developers and the educators who make decisions about CAI use; and the paucity of knowledge regarding how to integrate CAI effectively into clinical education. Specific roles for CAI in undergraduate and graduate medical education can include improving uniformity of instruction, providing documentation of exposure or competence, improving the learners' educational experience or outcomes, and assessment that is matched to learning. Funding for CAI remains an important barrier but the authors believe that this will be overcome when use of CAI becomes more widespread.
这一思考基于这样的前提,即更广泛地使用计算机辅助教学(CAI)能够改善临床教育,并且一份路线图将使更多医学教育工作者开始使用CAI。使用CAI的理由包括其许多固有特征,如多媒体的融入和交互性,但CAI的使用仍然有限,显然是因为教育工作者对CAI的作用并不信服。文中讨论了使用CAI的障碍,包括对CAI有效性文献的误解;CAI开发者与决定使用CAI的教育工作者之间的脱节;以及关于如何将CAI有效整合到临床教育中的知识匮乏。CAI在本科和研究生医学教育中的具体作用可以包括提高教学的一致性、提供接触或能力的记录、改善学习者的教育体验或成果,以及与学习相匹配的评估。CAI的资金仍然是一个重要障碍,但作者认为,当CAI的使用变得更加广泛时,这一障碍将被克服。