Suppr超能文献

[医学课程的定性排名毫无用处]。

[Qualitative ranking of medical curricula is useless].

作者信息

Huisjes H J

出版信息

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2006 Oct 21;150(42):2331.

Abstract

Saying that a qualitative ranking of medical schools would be helpful implies that it is feasible. There are two reasons why this may not be the case. Firstly, any medical school can be characterised by many aspects of varying quality and importance, not necessarily 'good' or 'bad', resulting in an arbitrary assessment of overall quality. Secondly, evaluation of an aspect results in a score on an ordinal scale, which is not suitable for current arithmetic operations. Since the introduction of the visitation system, the qualitative differences between schools have decreased. Therefore, an objective description of each of the medical schools, including its special characteristics, would be more useful for the aspirant student than ranking.

摘要

认为对医学院校进行定性排名会有所帮助,这意味着这种做法是可行的。但情况可能并非如此,原因有两个。首先,任何一所医学院校都可以从质量和重要性各不相同的多个方面来描述,不一定是“好”或“坏”,这就导致对整体质量的评估具有随意性。其次,对某一方面的评估会得出一个顺序量表上的分数,而这种分数并不适用于当前的算术运算。自引入视察制度以来,各院校之间的质量差异已经减小。因此,对每所医学院校进行客观描述,包括其特色,对有志报考的学生来说比排名更有用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验