• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高左心室质量指数并不限制血流储备分数在病变严重程度生理评估中的应用。

High left ventricular mass index does not limit the utility of fractional flow reserve for the physiologic assessment of lesion severity.

作者信息

Chhatriwalla Adnan K, Ragosta Michael, Powers Eric R, Sarembock Ian J, Gimple Lawrence W, Fischer Joshua J, Barringhaus Kurt G, Kramer Christopher M, Samady Habib

机构信息

Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health Systems, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.

出版信息

J Invasive Cardiol. 2006 Nov;18(11):544-9.

PMID:17090819
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To demonstrate that fractional flow reserve (FFR) of vessels in patients with high left ventricular mass index (LVMI) should be similar to that of matched vessels in patients with normal LVMI.

BACKGROUND

FFR is a physiologic index of coronary lesion severity. It is not known whether FFR remains useful in the setting of increased LVMI, when microvascular abnormalities may be present.

METHODS

LVMI was calculated in 84 patients using contrast left ventriculography after validation with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Cardiac risk factors, LV ejection fraction (LVEF), minimal lumen diameter (MLD), percent diameter stenosis (%DS), lesion length and FFR were compared in 22 patients with high LVMI to 62 patients with normal LVMI and angiographically-matched vessels.

RESULTS

LVMI was 126 +/- 21 g/m2 in the high LVMI group and 84 +/- 21 g/m2 in the normal LVMI group. There were no differences in age, LVEF, diabetes, hypertension or dyslipidemia between groups. Angiographic lesion characteristics were well matched in patients with high versus normal LVMI (MLD 1.3 +/- 0.6 mm vs. 1.3 +/- 0.6 mm, %DS 61 +/- 13% vs. 62 +/- 13%, and lesion length 14.2 +/- 7.0 mm vs. 14.3 +/- 7.0 mm; p = NS for all). Importantly, no difference in FFR was observed (0.79 +/- 0.12 vs. 0.78 +/- 0.16; p = NS) between the groups, and LVMI did not correlate with FFR in a multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

FFR of coronary lesions in patients with high LVMI is no different than FFR of angiographically-matched lesions in patients with normal LVMI, suggesting that high LV mass should not limit the utility of FFR as an index of coronary lesion severity.

摘要

目的

证明左心室质量指数(LVMI)高的患者血管的血流储备分数(FFR)应与LVMI正常的匹配患者血管的FFR相似。

背景

FFR是冠状动脉病变严重程度的生理指标。当可能存在微血管异常时,FFR在LVMI增加的情况下是否仍然有用尚不清楚。

方法

在84例患者中,经心脏磁共振成像验证后,使用对比剂左心室造影计算LVMI。比较22例LVMI高的患者与62例LVMI正常且血管造影匹配的患者的心脏危险因素、左心室射血分数(LVEF)、最小管腔直径(MLD)、直径狭窄百分比(%DS)、病变长度和FFR。

结果

LVMI高的组中LVMI为126±21 g/m²,LVMI正常的组中为84±21 g/m²。两组之间在年龄、LVEF、糖尿病、高血压或血脂异常方面无差异。LVMI高与正常的患者血管造影病变特征匹配良好(MLD 1.3±0.6 mm对1.3±0.6 mm,%DS 61±13%对62±13%,病变长度14.2±7.0 mm对14.3±7.0 mm;所有p值均为无统计学差异)。重要的是,两组之间未观察到FFR有差异(0.79±0.12对0.78±0.16;p =无统计学差异),并且在多变量分析中LVMI与FFR不相关。

结论

LVMI高的患者冠状动脉病变的FFR与LVMI正常且血管造影匹配的病变的FFR无差异,表明左心室质量高不应限制FFR作为冠状动脉病变严重程度指标的效用。

相似文献

1
High left ventricular mass index does not limit the utility of fractional flow reserve for the physiologic assessment of lesion severity.高左心室质量指数并不限制血流储备分数在病变严重程度生理评估中的应用。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2006 Nov;18(11):544-9.
2
Effect of acute myocardial infarction on the utility of fractional flow reserve for the physiologic assessment of the severity of coronary artery narrowing.急性心肌梗死对血流储备分数用于冠状动脉狭窄严重程度生理评估的效用的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2004 May 1;93(9):1102-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.01.035.
3
Broadening the applications of fractional flow reserve.
J Invasive Cardiol. 2006 Nov;18(11):550-1.
4
The prognostic value of combined intracoronary pressure and blood flow velocity measurements after deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention.延迟经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后联合冠状动脉内压力和血流速度测量的预后价值
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Feb 15;71(3):291-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21331.
5
The reliability of fractional flow reserve measurement in patients with diabetes mellitus.糖尿病患者中血流储备分数测量的可靠性
Coron Artery Dis. 2009 Aug;20(5):317-21. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e32832c8ca3.
6
The value of fractional and coronary flow reserve in predicting myocardial recovery in patients with previous myocardial infarction.分数血流储备和冠状动脉血流储备在预测既往心肌梗死患者心肌恢复中的价值。
Eur Heart J. 2008 Nov;29(21):2617-24. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn418. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
7
Cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: a comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve.用于冠状动脉疾病功能评估的心脏磁共振灌注成像:与冠状动脉造影和血流储备分数的比较
Eur Heart J. 2006 Jun;27(12):1465-71. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl039. Epub 2006 May 23.
8
[Long-term prognosis in diabetic patients in whom revascularization is deferred following fractional flow reserve assessment].[在经血流储备分数评估后延迟血运重建的糖尿病患者中的长期预后]
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):352-9.
9
Impact of fractional flow reserve measurement on the clinical management of patients with coronary artery disease evaluated with noninvasive stress tests prior to cardiac catheterization.在心脏导管插入术前通过无创负荷试验评估的分数血流储备测量对冠心病患者临床管理的影响。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2008 Oct-Dec;9(4):229-34. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2008.02.002.
10
Assessment of the contractile reserve in patients with intermediate coronary lesions: a strain rate imaging study validated by invasive myocardial fractional flow reserve.中度冠状动脉病变患者收缩储备功能的评估:一项经有创心肌血流储备分数验证的应变率成像研究
Eur Heart J. 2007 Jun;28(12):1425-32. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm082. Epub 2007 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Fractional Flow Reserve: Patient Selection and Perspectives.分流量储备:患者选择和观点。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2021 Dec 14;17:817-831. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S286916. eCollection 2021.
2
Fractional flow reserve: an updated review.血流储备分数:最新综述。
Clin Cardiol. 2014 Jun;37(6):371-80. doi: 10.1002/clc.22273. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
3
Invasive assessment of coronary flow reserve.冠状动脉血流储备的有创评估。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2008 Mar-Apr;15(2):276-81. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2008.01.008.