• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病患者中血流储备分数测量的可靠性

The reliability of fractional flow reserve measurement in patients with diabetes mellitus.

作者信息

Sahinarslan Asife, Kocaman Sinan Altan, Olgun Hilal, Kunak Tolga, Kiziltunç Emrullah, Ozdemir Murat, Timurkaynak Timur

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Gazi University, Ankara 06500, Turkey.

出版信息

Coron Artery Dis. 2009 Aug;20(5):317-21. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e32832c8ca3.

DOI:10.1097/MCA.0b013e32832c8ca3
PMID:19444091
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an invasive method to assess the functional significance of coronary stenoses. The value of FFR in diabetic patients is controversial because of microvascular dysfunction. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of diabetes mellitus (DM) on FFR measurements.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-one patients with an intermediate lesion who had undergone FFR measurement were included in the study. Lesion severity was determined by quantitative coronary angiography. The patients were divided into groups according to the presence (group 1) or absence (group 2) of DM. The patients were further categorized according to the degree of luminal narrowing caused by the lesion (40-50, 51-60, and >60%) and reference vessel diameter (> or = 2.8 and <2.8 mm). FFR measurements were compared in each category.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the FFR values of diabetic and nondiabetic patients who had coronary lesions with similar degree of luminal narrowing (0.87+/-0.08 vs. 0. 0.85+/-0.07; 0.81+/-0.08 vs. 0.82+/-0.10; 0.81+/-0.10 vs. 0.83+/-0.09, P = 0.957). In the analysis comparing FFR measurements in the categories set according to reference vessel diameter, we did not find a difference either (0.82+/-0.09 vs. 0.83+/-0.09; 0.84+/-0.09 vs. 0.82+/-0.09, P = 0.878). The DeltaFFR value, which is the difference between FFR values before and after adenosine administration, was also similar in diabetic and nondiabetic patients (8.4+/-6.0 vs. 8.4+/-5.5, P = 0.997).

CONCLUSION

The presence of DM does not have a significant impact on FFR values in coronary stenoses of intermediate severity.

摘要

背景

血流储备分数(FFR)是一种评估冠状动脉狭窄功能意义的侵入性方法。由于微血管功能障碍,FFR在糖尿病患者中的价值存在争议。本研究的目的是探讨糖尿病(DM)对FFR测量值的影响。

方法

本研究纳入了121例接受FFR测量的中度病变患者。病变严重程度通过定量冠状动脉造影确定。根据是否患有DM将患者分为两组(1组)或无DM组(2组)。根据病变引起的管腔狭窄程度(40-50%、51-60%和>60%)和参考血管直径(≥2.8和<2.8mm)对患者进一步分类。比较各分类中的FFR测量值。

结果

在管腔狭窄程度相似的冠状动脉病变的糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者中,FFR值无差异(0.87±0.08对0.85±0.07;0.81±0.08对0.82±0.10;0.81±0.10对0.83±0.09,P = 0.957)。在根据参考血管直径设定的分类中比较FFR测量值的分析中,我们也未发现差异(0.82±0.09对0.83±0.09;0.84±0.09对0.82±0.09,P = 0.878)。糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者中,腺苷给药前后FFR值的差值DeltaFFR也相似(8.4±6.0对8.4±5.5,P = 0.997)。

结论

DM的存在对中度严重程度冠状动脉狭窄的FFR值无显著影响。

相似文献

1
The reliability of fractional flow reserve measurement in patients with diabetes mellitus.糖尿病患者中血流储备分数测量的可靠性
Coron Artery Dis. 2009 Aug;20(5):317-21. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e32832c8ca3.
2
High left ventricular mass index does not limit the utility of fractional flow reserve for the physiologic assessment of lesion severity.高左心室质量指数并不限制血流储备分数在病变严重程度生理评估中的应用。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2006 Nov;18(11):544-9.
3
[Long-term prognosis in diabetic patients in whom revascularization is deferred following fractional flow reserve assessment].[在经血流储备分数评估后延迟血运重建的糖尿病患者中的长期预后]
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):352-9.
4
Impact of fractional flow reserve measurement on the clinical management of patients with coronary artery disease evaluated with noninvasive stress tests prior to cardiac catheterization.在心脏导管插入术前通过无创负荷试验评估的分数血流储备测量对冠心病患者临床管理的影响。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2008 Oct-Dec;9(4):229-34. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2008.02.002.
5
Assessment of the contractile reserve in patients with intermediate coronary lesions: a strain rate imaging study validated by invasive myocardial fractional flow reserve.中度冠状动脉病变患者收缩储备功能的评估:一项经有创心肌血流储备分数验证的应变率成像研究
Eur Heart J. 2007 Jun;28(12):1425-32. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm082. Epub 2007 May 15.
6
Cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: a comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve.用于冠状动脉疾病功能评估的心脏磁共振灌注成像:与冠状动脉造影和血流储备分数的比较
Eur Heart J. 2006 Jun;27(12):1465-71. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl039. Epub 2006 May 23.
7
The prognostic value of combined intracoronary pressure and blood flow velocity measurements after deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention.延迟经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后联合冠状动脉内压力和血流速度测量的预后价值
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Feb 15;71(3):291-7. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21331.
8
Effect of acute myocardial infarction on the utility of fractional flow reserve for the physiologic assessment of the severity of coronary artery narrowing.急性心肌梗死对血流储备分数用于冠状动脉狭窄严重程度生理评估的效用的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2004 May 1;93(9):1102-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.01.035.
9
The value of fractional and coronary flow reserve in predicting myocardial recovery in patients with previous myocardial infarction.分数血流储备和冠状动脉血流储备在预测既往心肌梗死患者心肌恢复中的价值。
Eur Heart J. 2008 Nov;29(21):2617-24. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn418. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
10
Effect of phentolamine on the hyperemic response to adenosine in patients with microvascular disease.酚妥拉明对微血管疾病患者腺苷充血反应的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2005 Dec 15;96(12):1627-30. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.07.078. Epub 2005 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
The safety profile of deferred revascularization in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing non-hyperemic functional assessments.接受非充血状态功能评估的冠心病患者延迟血运重建的安全性概况。
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2025 Jun 5;21(2):178-184. doi: 10.5114/aic.2025.151856. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
The importance of baseline fractional flow reserve to detect significant coronary artery stenosis in different patient populations.基线血流储备分数在不同患者人群中检测显著冠状动脉狭窄的重要性。
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2023;34(4):248-254. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2023-045. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
3
Fractional Flow Reserve: Patient Selection and Perspectives.
分流量储备:患者选择和观点。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2021 Dec 14;17:817-831. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S286916. eCollection 2021.
4
Usefulness of Routine Fractional Flow Reserve for Clinical Management of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Diabetes.常规血流储备分数在糖尿病患者冠状动脉疾病临床管理中的作用。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Mar 1;5(3):272-281. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.5097.
5
Comparison of Major Adverse Cardiac Events Between Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Strategy in Patients With or Without Type 2 Diabetes: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.瞬时无波比和血流储备分数指导策略在伴或不伴 2 型糖尿病患者中的主要不良心脏事件比较:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Sep 1;4(9):857-864. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.2298.
6
Is ischemia the only factor predicting cardiovascular outcomes in all diabetes mellitus patients?缺血是预测所有糖尿病患者心血管结局的唯一因素吗?
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017 Apr 20;16(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12933-017-0533-7.
7
Diabetes does not impact the diagnostic performance of contrast-based fractional flow reserve: insights from the CONTRAST study.糖尿病不影响基于造影剂的血流储备分数的诊断性能:来自CONTRAST研究的见解。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017 Jan 13;16(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12933-016-0494-2.
8
Impact of Aortic Stiffness Evaluated by Aortic Pulsatility on Fractional Flow Reserve.通过主动脉搏动性评估的主动脉僵硬度对血流储备分数的影响。
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2015 Mar;31(2):136-43. doi: 10.6515/acs20140526b.
9
Role of coronary physiology in the contemporary management of coronary artery disease.冠状动脉生理学在当代冠状动脉疾病管理中的作用。
World J Clin Cases. 2015 Feb 16;3(2):148-55. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i2.148.
10
Correlation between optical coherence tomography-derived intraluminal parameters and fractional flow reserve measurements in intermediate grade coronary lesions: a comparison between diabetic and non-diabetic patients.光学相干断层成像技术测量的管腔参数与中间狭窄程度冠状动脉病变的血流储备分数之间的相关性:糖尿病与非糖尿病患者的比较。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2015 Jan;104(1):59-70. doi: 10.1007/s00392-014-0759-2. Epub 2014 Aug 15.