• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[尿路感染的病因、危险因素及转归]

[Etiology, risk factors, and outcome of urinary tract infection].

作者信息

Adukauskiene Dalia, Kinderyte Aida, Tarasevicius Rimantas, Vitkauskiene Astra

机构信息

Clinic of Intensive Therapy, Kaunas University of Medicine, A. Mickeviciaus 9, 44307 Kaunas, Lithuania.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2006;42(10):805-9.

PMID:17090979
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the incidence and variety of microorganisms of positive urine culture in patients of intensive care units of Kaunas University of Medicine Hospital and to estimate the risk factors for colonization, development of urinary tract infection, and outcome during the period of 2003-2004.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients with a positive urine culture with or without clinical symptoms of urinary tract infection admitted to an intensive care unit.

RESULTS

The growth of microorganisms was determined in urine of 82 (3.9%) patients: urinary tract infection in 64 (78%) and colonization in 18 (22%) patients. Among pathogens of urinary tract infection rods predominated significantly (p<0.05). No significant difference was found among colonizing microorganisms (p>0.05). E. coli in urine culture was obtained exclusively in cases of urinary tract infection. All patients with a positive urine culture had catheterized urinary bladder (p<0.05). No influence of age, sex, or duration of catheterization alone on the occurrence of urinary tract infection, colonization, or outcome was found (p>0.05). In cases of the same sex, age, and underlying disease of the patients, the risk of urinary tract infection with every day of catheterization significantly increased by 21.7% (p<0.05). Among patients with lethal outcome there was a significant prevalence of rods in urine culture (p<0.05). In survivors, no significant pathogen was detected in urine culture (p>0.05). In cases of the same sex, age, underlying disease, and duration of catheterization, the development of urinary tract infection significantly increased the risk of lethal outcome by 5.5 times (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Positive urine culture was found in 3.9% of patients, three-quarters of them were due to urinary tract infection. Rods were the predominant pathogens in urinary tract infection. E. coli in urinary tract always resulted in urinary tract infection. Catheterization of urinary bladder resulted in urinary tract infection or colonization. Each day of urinary bladder catheterization increased the risk of development of urinary tract infection by 21.7%. Rods in urine culture were associated with lethal outcome. Development of urinary tract infection increased the risk of lethal outcome 5.5 times.

摘要

目的

确定考纳斯医科大学医院重症监护病房患者尿培养阳性的微生物发生率及种类,并评估2003 - 2004年期间定植、尿路感染发生及转归的危险因素。

材料与方法

我们回顾性分析了入住重症监护病房且尿培养阳性、有或无尿路感染临床症状的患者。

结果

82例(3.9%)患者的尿液中检测到微生物生长:64例(78%)为尿路感染,18例(22%)为定植。尿路感染病原体中杆菌占显著优势(p<0.05)。定植微生物之间未发现显著差异(p>0.05)。尿培养中仅在尿路感染病例中分离出大肠杆菌。所有尿培养阳性患者均有导尿史(p<0.05)。未发现年龄、性别或单独的导尿时间对尿路感染、定植或转归的发生有影响(p>0.05)。在性别、年龄和基础疾病相同的患者中,导尿每一天尿路感染的风险显著增加21.7%(p<0.05)。在死亡患者中,尿培养中杆菌显著占优势(p<0.05)。在存活患者中,尿培养未检测到显著的病原体(p>0.05)。在性别、年龄、基础疾病和导尿时间相同的情况下,尿路感染的发生使死亡风险显著增加5.5倍(p<0.05)。

结论

3.9%的患者尿培养阳性,其中四分之三是由尿路感染引起。杆菌是尿路感染的主要病原体。尿路中的大肠杆菌总是导致尿路感染。导尿会导致尿路感染或定植。导尿每一天尿路感染发生的风险增加21.7%。尿培养中的杆菌与死亡结局相关。尿路感染的发生使死亡风险增加5.5倍。

相似文献

1
[Etiology, risk factors, and outcome of urinary tract infection].[尿路感染的病因、危险因素及转归]
Medicina (Kaunas). 2006;42(10):805-9.
2
Survey on hospital-acquired urinary tract infection in neurological intensive care unit.神经内科重症监护病房医院获得性泌尿道感染调查。
APMIS. 2013 Mar;121(3):197-201. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2012.02956.x. Epub 2012 Jul 28.
3
[Etiologic agents and risk factors in nosocomial urinary tract infections].[医院获得性尿路感染的病原体及危险因素]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2008 Apr;42(2):245-54.
4
The Effect of Urinary Catheters on Microbial Biofilms and Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections.导尿管对微生物生物膜及导尿管相关尿路感染的影响
Urol J. 2017 Mar 16;14(2):3028-3034.
5
Urinary tract infection. Diabetics and non-diabetic patients.尿路感染。糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者。
Saudi Med J. 2001 Apr;22(4):326-9.
6
[Risk factors for nosocomial urinary tract infection in the intensive care unit with a positive urine culture and foley catheterization].[重症监护病房中尿培养阳性且留置导尿管情况下医院获得性尿路感染的危险因素]
Taehan Kanho Hakhoe Chi. 2007 Dec;37(7):1149-58. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2007.37.7.1149.
7
Epidemiology of intensive care unit-acquired urinary tract infections.重症监护病房获得性尿路感染的流行病学
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2006 Feb;19(1):67-71. doi: 10.1097/01.qco.0000200292.37909.e0.
8
[Hospital-acquired urinary tract infections].医院获得性尿路感染
Medicina (Kaunas). 2006;42(12):957-64.
9
[Analysis of the risk factors in nosocomial urinary tract infections and effect of urinary catheter use on distribution of the causative agents].[医院获得性尿路感染的危险因素分析及导尿管使用对病原体分布的影响]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2009 Jan;43(1):77-82.
10
[Catheter-associated urinary tract infection].导管相关尿路感染
Rev Prat. 2014 May;64(5):651-5.

引用本文的文献

1
A survey on urinary tract infections associated with the three most common uropathogenic bacteria.一项关于与三种最常见尿路致病菌相关的尿路感染的调查。
Maedica (Bucur). 2010 Apr;5(2):111-5.
2
A comparative study to assess the effect of amikacin sulfate bladder wash on catheter-associated urinary tract infection in neurosurgical patients.一项评估硫酸阿米卡星膀胱冲洗对神经外科患者导管相关性尿路感染影响的对比研究。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2009 Jan-Mar;13(1):17-20. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.53110.